PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FALAX vs. FNILX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FALAX vs. FNILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class A (FALAX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FALAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
11.80%
3Y*
18.84%
5Y*
12.02%
10Y*
13.87%

FNILX

1D
-0.77%
1M
4.37%
YTD
10.70%
6M
10.49%
1Y
27.60%
3Y*
22.69%
5Y*
13.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FALAX vs. FNILX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FALAX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class A
0.00%19.36%26.05%23.16%-8.16%25.49%8.56%31.37%-15.59%
FNILX
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund
10.70%17.81%25.47%27.45%-19.37%26.67%21.13%31.79%-13.60%

Correlation

The correlation between FALAX and FNILX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2018

0.88

Over the past year, the correlation between FALAX and FNILX has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FALAX vs. FNILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FALAX
FALAX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
FALAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FALAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
FALAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FALAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FALAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

FNILX
FNILX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FNILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNILX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FNILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNILX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FALAX vs. FNILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class A (FALAX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FALAXFNILXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.42

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

3.08

-0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.58

14.10

-9.52

FALAX vs. FNILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FALAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the FNILX Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FALAX and FNILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FALAXFNILXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

2.33

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.80

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.76

-0.29

Drawdowns

FALAX vs. FNILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FALAX drawdown since its inception was -63.41%, which is greater than FNILX's maximum drawdown of -33.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FALAX and FNILX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FALAXFNILXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.41%

-33.76%

-29.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.05%

-9.01%

+3.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.92%

-19.08%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.62%

-25.40%

+3.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.19%

-0.77%

-3.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.96%

-5.37%

-8.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

1.97%

+0.84%

Volatility

FALAX vs. FNILX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class A (FALAX) is 0.00%, while Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX) has a volatility of 3.00%. This indicates that FALAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FALAXFNILXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

3.00%

-3.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.10%

9.01%

-4.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.05%

11.96%

-3.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.44%

17.25%

-0.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.58%

20.04%

-1.46%

FALAX vs. FNILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FALAX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FNILX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FALAX vs. FNILX - Dividend Comparison

FALAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.03%, more than FNILX's 0.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FALAX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class A
6.03%6.03%6.33%3.46%2.21%6.69%5.50%8.65%17.32%6.41%2.11%3.02%
FNILX
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund
0.91%1.01%1.09%1.34%1.53%0.95%1.20%1.17%0.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FALAX and FNILX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNILX has higher volatility (3.00%) compared to FALAX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FALAX dropped -63.41% vs FNILX's -33.76%.

FNILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FALAX and FNILX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer