FALAX vs. FCNTX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FALAX (Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class A) and FCNTX (Fidelity Contrafund) are both mutual funds - FALAX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FCNTX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FALAX returned 13.87%/yr vs 17.43%/yr for FCNTX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FALAX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FCNTX.

Performance

FALAX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class A (FALAX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, FALAX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 13.87%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.43% annualized return.

FALAX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 11.93%
• 3Y*: 18.84%
• 5Y*: 12.12%
• 10Y*: 13.87%

FCNTX

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 3.65%
• YTD: 7.76%
• 6M: 10.05%
• 1Y: 23.72%
• 3Y*: 26.93%
• 5Y*: 15.12%
• 10Y*: 17.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FALAX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FALAX Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class A	0.00%	19.36%	26.05%	23.16%	-8.16%	25.49%	8.56%	31.37%	-8.64%	16.87%
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund	7.76%	21.76%	36.00%	38.67%	-28.31%	24.52%	32.48%	30.00%	-3.81%	32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FALAX and FCNTX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 1996	0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between FALAX and FCNTX has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FALAX vs. FCNTX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FALAX	FCNTX
Technology	25.2%	27.0%
Industrials	18.9%	8.6%
Financial Services	15.6%	13.8%
Healthcare	10.5%	9.2%
Communication Services	9.9%	21.2%
Energy	8.5%	3.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.3%	3.7%
Consumer Cyclical	2.9%	10.1%
Basic Materials	2.3%	2.1%
Utilities	1.1%	0.5%
Real Estate	0.7%	0.1%

Return for Risk

FALAX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FALAX

FALAX Risk / Return Rank: 44
FALAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
FALAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
FALAX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
FALAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
FALAX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

FCNTX

FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 35
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FALAX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class A (FALAX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FALAX	FCNTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	1.72	+0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.51	2.39	+0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.31	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.85	2.13	+0.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.85	9.04	-4.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FALAX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FALAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FALAX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FALAX	FCNTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.79	1.72	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76	0.79	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76	0.89	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.78	-0.31

Drawdowns

FALAX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FALAX drawdown since its inception was -63.41%, which is greater than FCNTX's maximum drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FALAX and FCNTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FALAX	FCNTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.41%	-49.19%	-14.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.05%	-11.30%	+6.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.92%	-19.75%	+0.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.62%	-32.59%	+10.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.55%	-32.59%	-4.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.19%	-0.53%	-3.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.96%	-8.16%	-5.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.79%	2.65%	+0.14%

Volatility

FALAX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class A (FALAX) is 0.00%, while Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that FALAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FALAX	FCNTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	3.26%	-3.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.20%	10.48%	-6.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.08%	14.03%	-5.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.44%	19.15%	-2.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.59%	19.68%	-1.09%

FALAX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FALAX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

FALAX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

FALAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.03%, more than FCNTX's 4.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FALAX Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class A	6.03%	6.03%	6.33%	3.46%	2.21%	6.69%	5.50%	8.65%	17.32%	6.41%	2.11%	3.02%
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund	4.33%	5.21%	4.19%	3.78%	11.87%	10.80%	8.01%	4.16%	7.46%	6.08%	3.81%	5.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FALAX and FCNTX in my portfolio?

FALAX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FALAX or FCNTX?

FCNTX has higher volatility (3.26%) compared to FALAX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FALAX dropped -63.41% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FALAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.