PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAHY.L vs. BMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAHY.L vs. BMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist (FAHY.L) and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FAHY.L is traded in GBp, while BMY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BMY values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAHY.L achieves a 0.89% return, which is significantly lower than BMY's 9.63% return.


FAHY.L

1D
0.30%
1M
1.23%
YTD
0.89%
6M
-0.21%
1Y
8.81%
3Y*
5.13%
5Y*
3.70%
10Y*

BMY

1D
1.82%
1M
3.12%
YTD
9.63%
6M
12.19%
1Y
27.89%
3Y*
-2.19%
5Y*
2.73%
10Y*
1.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAHY.L vs. BMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAHY.L
Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist
0.89%2.08%6.93%4.14%-3.51%6.81%5.36%9.22%0.08%-0.79%
BMY
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
9.63%-7.02%17.83%-29.84%33.13%3.85%-2.54%22.88%-7.73%-1.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FAHY.L and BMY is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2016

0.28

The correlation between FAHY.L and BMY shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAHY.L vs. BMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAHY.L
FAHY.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
FAHY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAHY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAHY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FAHY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAHY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

BMY
BMY Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
BMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMY Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
BMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMY Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAHY.L vs. BMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist (FAHY.L) and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FAHY.LBMYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.20

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

2.27

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.82

4.84

+0.98

FAHY.L vs. BMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAHY.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is higher than the BMY Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAHY.L and BMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FAHY.LBMYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

1.06

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.11

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.37

+0.07

Drawdowns

FAHY.L vs. BMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAHY.L drawdown since its inception was -23.91%, smaller than the maximum BMY drawdown of -52.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAHY.L and BMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAHY.LBMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.91%

-52.64%

+28.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.99%

-12.35%

+8.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.89%

-37.43%

+27.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.66%

-52.64%

+40.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.91%

-28.73%

+27.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.15%

-15.97%

+11.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

5.78%

-4.25%

Volatility

FAHY.L vs. BMY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist (FAHY.L) is 1.51%, while Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) has a volatility of 7.62%. This indicates that FAHY.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAHY.LBMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.51%

7.62%

-6.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.22%

18.41%

-14.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.78%

26.37%

-20.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.27%

24.80%

-16.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.96%

26.00%

-16.04%

Dividends

FAHY.L vs. BMY - Dividend Comparison

FAHY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.55%, more than BMY's 4.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BMY
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
4.37%4.60%4.24%4.44%3.00%2.36%3.69%2.55%3.08%2.55%1.95%2.17%
FAHY.L
Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist
6.55%6.61%6.89%6.85%5.66%4.54%6.26%6.22%6.01%5.63%1.23%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAHY.L and BMY have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAHY.L and BMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer