FAHY.DE vs. ZFH.TO
FAHY.DE (Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist) and ZFH.TO (BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. FAHY.DE is passively managed, while ZFH.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FAHY.DE returned 3.02%/yr vs 4.99%/yr for ZFH.TO. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FAHY.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for ZFH.TO.
Performance
FAHY.DE vs. ZFH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FAHY.DE is traded in EUR, while ZFH.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ZFH.TO values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAHY.DE achieves a 4.63% return, which is significantly higher than ZFH.TO's 2.44% return.
FAHY.DE
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 2.12%
- 6M
- 2.96%
- YTD
- 4.63%
- 1Y
- 7.97%
- 3Y*
- 6.67%
- 5Y*
- 3.02%
- 10Y*
- —
ZFH.TO
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- 6M
- 2.24%
- YTD
- 2.44%
- 1Y
- 3.45%
- 3Y*
- 5.67%
- 5Y*
- 4.99%
- 10Y*
- 4.19%
FAHY.DE vs. ZFH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAHY.DE Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist | 4.63% | -2.30% | 10.83% | 6.42% | -8.70% | 14.53% | -0.82% | 16.15% | -1.46% | -4.35% |
ZFH.TO BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF | 2.44% | -2.47% | 9.74% | 12.93% | -1.02% | 12.69% | -9.65% | 18.58% | -2.68% | -0.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAHY.DE and ZFH.TO is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2016 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAHY.DE vs. ZFH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FAHY.DE
ZFH.TO
FAHY.DE vs. ZFH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist (FAHY.DE) and BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF (ZFH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FAHY.DE | ZFH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.08 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.40 | 0.96 | +1.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.05 | 2.35 | +3.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FAHY.DE vs. ZFH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAHY.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.24%, roughly equal to the maximum ZFH.TO drawdown of -27.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAHY.DE and ZFH.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAHY.DE | ZFH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.24% | -27.55% | -0.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.31% | -3.59% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.30% | -11.24% | -1.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.30% | -11.24% | -1.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.72% | -2.24% | +1.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.84% | -4.88% | -0.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.31% | 1.48% | -0.17% |
Volatility
FAHY.DE vs. ZFH.TO - Volatility Comparison
Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist (FAHY.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.51% compared to BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF (ZFH.TO) at 1.19%. This indicates that FAHY.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZFH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAHY.DE | ZFH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.51% | 1.19% | +1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.83% | 5.99% | -1.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.67% | 8.28% | -1.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.46% | 12.39% | -3.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.81% | 13.38% | +0.43% |
FAHY.DE vs. ZFH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAHY.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ZFH.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAHY.DE vs. ZFH.TO - Dividend Comparison
FAHY.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.45%, more than ZFH.TO's 5.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAHY.DE Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist | 6.45% | 6.75% | 6.86% | 6.89% | 5.82% | 4.47% | 6.24% | 6.07% | 6.09% | 5.71% | 1.23% | 0.00% |
ZFH.TO BMO Floating Rate High Yield ETF | 5.17% | 5.58% | 7.82% | 7.07% | 4.81% | 4.54% | 4.57% | 4.32% | 4.51% | 4.64% | 4.70% | 5.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAHY.DE and ZFH.TO have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZFH.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZFH.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FAHY.DE.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FAHY.DE and 0.40% for ZFH.TO.
Find the right allocation for FAHY.DE and ZFH.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer