PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAHEX vs. PRCPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAHEX vs. PRCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class C (FAHEX) and T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAHEX achieves a 6.75% return, which is significantly higher than PRCPX's 2.38% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FAHEX having a 6.82% annualized return and PRCPX not far behind at 6.62%.


FAHEX

1D
0.08%
1M
1.56%
YTD
6.75%
6M
7.81%
1Y
16.18%
3Y*
11.20%
5Y*
5.52%
10Y*
6.82%

PRCPX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.65%
YTD
2.38%
6M
4.13%
1Y
10.72%
3Y*
10.96%
5Y*
5.80%
10Y*
6.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAHEX vs. PRCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAHEX
Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class C
6.75%10.97%8.51%11.23%-11.89%10.09%7.88%16.50%-6.17%10.57%
PRCPX
T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund
2.38%11.51%9.36%14.90%-10.50%6.36%5.55%13.77%-1.44%6.80%

Correlation

The correlation between FAHEX and PRCPX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2014

0.70

The correlation between FAHEX and PRCPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAHEX vs. PRCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAHEX
FAHEX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FAHEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAHEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAHEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FAHEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAHEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

PRCPX
PRCPX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
PRCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
PRCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAHEX vs. PRCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class C (FAHEX) and T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FAHEXPRCPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.95

3.21

-0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.34

6.16

-1.82

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.83

-0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.27

5.39

-0.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

21.56

25.91

-4.36

FAHEX vs. PRCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAHEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.95, which is comparable to the PRCPX Sharpe Ratio of 3.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAHEX and PRCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FAHEXPRCPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.95

3.21

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

1.21

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

1.22

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.89

-0.12

Drawdowns

FAHEX vs. PRCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAHEX drawdown since its inception was -49.00%, which is greater than PRCPX's maximum drawdown of -23.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAHEX and PRCPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAHEXPRCPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.00%

-23.07%

-25.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.14%

-1.99%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.11%

-3.83%

-3.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.76%

-14.34%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.52%

-23.07%

-5.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.12%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.02%

-3.12%

-1.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

0.41%

+0.36%

Volatility

FAHEX vs. PRCPX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class C (FAHEX) has a higher volatility of 1.70% compared to T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX) at 1.14%. This indicates that FAHEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAHEXPRCPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.70%

1.14%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.40%

2.48%

+1.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.58%

3.36%

+2.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.35%

4.82%

+1.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.62%

5.46%

+2.16%

FAHEX vs. PRCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAHEX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PRCPX's 0.81% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAHEX vs. PRCPX - Dividend Comparison

FAHEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, less than PRCPX's 9.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAHEX
Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class C
3.42%3.73%3.34%3.80%6.26%3.92%2.76%3.50%4.90%3.91%4.50%3.45%
PRCPX
T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund
9.85%9.32%8.77%7.88%4.89%5.11%5.36%5.18%5.72%4.95%5.88%7.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAHEX and PRCPX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAHEX has higher volatility (1.70%) compared to PRCPX (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAHEX dropped -49.00% vs PRCPX's -23.07%.

PRCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 2.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAHEX and PRCPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer