FAHCX vs. RSIIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class I (FAHCX) and RiverPark Strategic Income Fund (RSIIX).
FAHCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 3, 1995. RSIIX is managed by RiverPark Funds. It was launched on Sep 30, 2013.
Performance
FAHCX vs. RSIIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FAHCX vs. RSIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAHCX Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class I | 0.45% | 12.06% | 9.50% | 12.15% | -11.15% | 10.96% | 8.94% | 17.81% | -5.25% | 11.74% |
RSIIX RiverPark Strategic Income Fund | 0.36% | 6.04% | 8.44% | 9.59% | -3.31% | 11.60% | 3.42% | 3.50% | 1.36% | 4.84% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAHCX achieves a 0.45% return, which is significantly higher than RSIIX's 0.36% return. Over the past 10 years, FAHCX has outperformed RSIIX with an annualized return of 7.56%, while RSIIX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.50% annualized return.
FAHCX
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- -1.76%
- YTD
- 0.45%
- 6M
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- 13.51%
- 3Y*
- 10.09%
- 5Y*
- 5.53%
- 10Y*
- 7.56%
RSIIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.59%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 0.82%
- 1Y
- 5.26%
- 3Y*
- 7.43%
- 5Y*
- 5.19%
- 10Y*
- 5.50%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FAHCX vs. RSIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAHCX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than RSIIX's 1.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FAHCX vs. RSIIX — Risk / Return Rank
FAHCX
RSIIX
FAHCX vs. RSIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class I (FAHCX) and RiverPark Strategic Income Fund (RSIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAHCX | RSIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.06 | 2.29 | -0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.87 | 2.92 | -0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.62 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | 3.50 | -0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.21 | 14.75 | -0.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAHCX | RSIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06 | 2.29 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 | 2.27 | -1.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.00 | 1.98 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.95 | 1.70 | -0.75 |
Correlation
The correlation between FAHCX and RSIIX is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FAHCX vs. RSIIX - Dividend Comparison
FAHCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, less than RSIIX's 7.62% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAHCX Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class I | 4.35% | 4.73% | 4.18% | 4.70% | 7.35% | 4.94% | 3.70% | 4.51% | 6.09% | 4.95% | 5.53% | 4.42% |
RSIIX RiverPark Strategic Income Fund | 7.62% | 7.75% | 7.67% | 7.61% | 6.58% | 5.12% | 5.77% | 4.84% | 4.59% | 4.98% | 5.10% | 6.57% |
Drawdowns
FAHCX vs. RSIIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAHCX drawdown since its inception was -48.10%, which is greater than RSIIX's maximum drawdown of -15.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAHCX and RSIIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAHCX | RSIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.10% | -15.55% | -32.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.34% | -1.50% | -2.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.16% | -5.61% | -9.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.49% | -15.55% | -12.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.96% | -0.87% | -1.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.64% | -1.18% | -3.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.00% | 0.36% | +0.64% |
Volatility
FAHCX vs. RSIIX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class I (FAHCX) has a higher volatility of 2.56% compared to RiverPark Strategic Income Fund (RSIIX) at 1.14%. This indicates that FAHCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FAHCX | RSIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.56% | 1.14% | +1.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.31% | 1.61% | +2.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.74% | 2.30% | +4.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.31% | 2.30% | +4.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.61% | 2.78% | +4.83% |