PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAHCX vs. JGH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAHCX vs. JGH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class I (FAHCX) and Nuveen Global High Income Fund (JGH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAHCX achieves a 6.18% return, which is significantly higher than JGH's 5.00% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FAHCX having a 7.44% annualized return and JGH not far ahead at 7.68%.


FAHCX

1D
-0.49%
1M
-0.59%
6M
4.75%
YTD
6.18%
1Y
12.19%
3Y*
11.02%
5Y*
5.92%
10Y*
7.44%

JGH

1D
0.16%
1M
-1.84%
6M
2.80%
YTD
5.00%
1Y
6.51%
3Y*
14.59%
5Y*
5.36%
10Y*
7.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAHCX vs. JGH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAHCX
Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class I
6.18%12.06%9.50%12.15%-11.15%10.96%8.94%17.81%-5.25%11.74%
JGH
Nuveen Global High Income Fund
5.00%8.62%15.98%20.89%-21.01%10.84%2.77%30.04%-12.02%15.25%

Correlation

The correlation between FAHCX and JGH is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2014

0.46

The correlation between FAHCX and JGH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.41 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAHCX vs. JGH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAHCX
FAHCX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FAHCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAHCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAHCX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FAHCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAHCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

JGH
JGH Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
JGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
JGH Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
JGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
JGH Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAHCX vs. JGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class I (FAHCX) and Nuveen Global High Income Fund (JGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FAHCXJGHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.13

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.91

0.78

+3.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.96

1.88

+13.08

FAHCX vs. JGH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAHCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the JGH Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAHCX and JGH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FAHCX vs. JGH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAHCX drawdown since its inception was -48.10%, which is greater than JGH's maximum drawdown of -43.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAHCX and JGH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAHCXJGHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.10%

-43.79%

-4.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.13%

-8.37%

+5.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.98%

-13.70%

+6.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.16%

-28.66%

+13.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.49%

-43.79%

+15.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.63%

-2.17%

+0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.61%

-6.95%

+2.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

3.47%

-2.65%

Volatility

FAHCX vs. JGH - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class I (FAHCX) has a higher volatility of 2.72% compared to Nuveen Global High Income Fund (JGH) at 2.29%. This indicates that FAHCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAHCXJGHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.72%

2.29%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.15%

7.41%

-2.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.19%

10.29%

-4.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.52%

13.80%

-7.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.62%

15.86%

-8.24%

FAHCX vs. JGH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAHCX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than JGH's 1.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAHCX vs. JGH - Dividend Comparison

FAHCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, less than JGH's 9.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAHCX
Fidelity Advisor High Income Advantage Fund Class I
4.42%4.73%4.18%4.70%7.35%4.94%3.70%4.51%6.09%4.95%5.53%4.42%
JGH
Nuveen Global High Income Fund
9.84%9.82%9.67%10.18%12.05%8.19%7.13%7.53%9.88%8.52%9.61%11.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAHCX and JGH have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAHCX has higher volatility (2.72%) compared to JGH (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAHCX dropped -48.10% vs JGH's -43.79%.

FAHCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAHCX and JGH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer