FAGCX vs. MEIFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I (FAGCX) and Meridian Enhanced Equity Fund (MEIFX).
FAGCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 3, 1995. MEIFX is managed by Meridian. It was launched on Jan 31, 2005.
Performance
FAGCX vs. MEIFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FAGCX vs. MEIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAGCX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I | -9.48% | 22.47% | 39.06% | 45.51% | -32.60% | 16.63% | 74.20% | 47.51% | 19.08% | 37.70% |
MEIFX Meridian Enhanced Equity Fund | 0.08% | 6.51% | 13.19% | 18.96% | -16.43% | 15.15% | 26.18% | 44.95% | -0.51% | 27.94% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAGCX achieves a -9.48% return, which is significantly lower than MEIFX's 0.08% return. Over the past 10 years, FAGCX has outperformed MEIFX with an annualized return of 22.70%, while MEIFX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.97% annualized return.
FAGCX
- 1D
- 4.77%
- 1M
- -5.79%
- YTD
- -9.48%
- 6M
- -8.40%
- 1Y
- 23.02%
- 3Y*
- 25.13%
- 5Y*
- 10.36%
- 10Y*
- 22.70%
MEIFX
- 1D
- 1.71%
- 1M
- -1.28%
- YTD
- 0.08%
- 6M
- -0.22%
- 1Y
- 7.08%
- 3Y*
- 10.32%
- 5Y*
- 5.80%
- 10Y*
- 13.97%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FAGCX vs. MEIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAGCX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than MEIFX's 1.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FAGCX vs. MEIFX — Risk / Return Rank
FAGCX
MEIFX
FAGCX vs. MEIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I (FAGCX) and Meridian Enhanced Equity Fund (MEIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAGCX | MEIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.00 | 0.47 | +0.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.53 | 0.81 | +0.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.11 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 0.74 | +0.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.36 | 3.44 | +1.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAGCX | MEIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 0.47 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.37 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 | 0.78 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.52 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between FAGCX and MEIFX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FAGCX vs. MEIFX - Dividend Comparison
FAGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, less than MEIFX's 7.24% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAGCX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I | 4.05% | 3.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.34% | 14.14% | 7.31% | 7.69% | 14.30% | 8.00% | 15.78% | 16.11% |
MEIFX Meridian Enhanced Equity Fund | 7.24% | 7.25% | 14.61% | 0.61% | 9.28% | 25.44% | 13.26% | 40.49% | 11.67% | 1.18% | 0.78% | 4.24% |
Drawdowns
FAGCX vs. MEIFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAGCX drawdown since its inception was -69.09%, which is greater than MEIFX's maximum drawdown of -54.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAGCX and MEIFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAGCX | MEIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.09% | -54.37% | -14.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.10% | -8.99% | -7.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.72% | -23.54% | -15.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.72% | -28.67% | -10.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.10% | -5.84% | -6.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.84% | -7.76% | -11.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.46% | 2.06% | +2.40% |
Volatility
FAGCX vs. MEIFX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I (FAGCX) has a higher volatility of 8.51% compared to Meridian Enhanced Equity Fund (MEIFX) at 3.99%. This indicates that FAGCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FAGCX | MEIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.51% | 3.99% | +4.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.81% | 7.32% | +7.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.42% | 14.98% | +9.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.44% | 15.95% | +9.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.42% | 17.96% | +6.46% |