FAGCX vs. FSKAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I (FAGCX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX).
FAGCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 3, 1995. FSKAX is managed by Fidelity.
Performance
FAGCX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FAGCX vs. FSKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAGCX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I | -9.48% | 22.47% | 39.06% | 45.51% | -32.60% | 16.63% | 74.20% | 47.51% | 19.08% | 37.70% |
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund | -3.98% | 17.06% | 23.89% | 26.12% | -19.53% | 25.66% | 20.79% | 30.92% | -5.32% | 20.85% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAGCX achieves a -9.48% return, which is significantly lower than FSKAX's -3.98% return. Over the past 10 years, FAGCX has outperformed FSKAX with an annualized return of 22.70%, while FSKAX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.56% annualized return.
FAGCX
- 1D
- 4.77%
- 1M
- -5.79%
- YTD
- -9.48%
- 6M
- -8.40%
- 1Y
- 23.02%
- 3Y*
- 25.13%
- 5Y*
- 10.36%
- 10Y*
- 22.70%
FSKAX
- 1D
- 2.99%
- 1M
- -5.06%
- YTD
- -3.98%
- 6M
- -2.04%
- 1Y
- 17.68%
- 3Y*
- 17.87%
- 5Y*
- 10.50%
- 10Y*
- 13.56%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FAGCX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAGCX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FAGCX vs. FSKAX — Risk / Return Rank
FAGCX
FSKAX
FAGCX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I (FAGCX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAGCX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.00 | 0.98 | +0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.53 | 1.49 | +0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.23 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 1.50 | -0.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.36 | 7.20 | -1.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAGCX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 0.98 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.61 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 | 0.74 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.79 | -0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between FAGCX and FSKAX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FAGCX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison
FAGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, more than FSKAX's 1.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAGCX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I | 4.05% | 3.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.34% | 14.14% | 7.31% | 7.69% | 14.30% | 8.00% | 15.78% | 16.11% |
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund | 1.06% | 1.01% | 1.19% | 1.41% | 1.62% | 1.15% | 1.45% | 1.94% | 2.54% | 2.07% | 2.43% | 0.82% |
Drawdowns
FAGCX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAGCX drawdown since its inception was -69.09%, which is greater than FSKAX's maximum drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAGCX and FSKAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAGCX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.09% | -35.01% | -34.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.10% | -12.42% | -3.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.72% | -25.39% | -13.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.72% | -35.01% | -3.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.10% | -6.20% | -5.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.84% | -4.05% | -14.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.46% | 2.60% | +1.86% |
Volatility
FAGCX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I (FAGCX) has a higher volatility of 8.51% compared to Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) at 5.52%. This indicates that FAGCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSKAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FAGCX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.51% | 5.52% | +2.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.81% | 9.85% | +4.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.42% | 18.69% | +5.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.44% | 17.42% | +8.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.42% | 18.44% | +5.98% |