PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAGCX vs. FNIAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAGCX vs. FNIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I (FAGCX) and Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class A (FNIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAGCX achieves a 16.86% return, which is significantly higher than FNIAX's 9.43% return. Over the past 10 years, FAGCX has outperformed FNIAX with an annualized return of 25.71%, while FNIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 16.25% annualized return.


FAGCX

1D
-0.07%
1M
8.79%
YTD
16.86%
6M
18.06%
1Y
40.97%
3Y*
32.05%
5Y*
16.08%
10Y*
25.71%

FNIAX

1D
0.04%
1M
3.51%
YTD
9.43%
6M
12.58%
1Y
27.79%
3Y*
27.04%
5Y*
15.23%
10Y*
16.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAGCX vs. FNIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAGCX
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I
16.86%22.47%39.06%45.51%-32.60%16.63%74.20%47.51%19.08%37.70%
FNIAX
Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class A
9.43%21.17%34.94%35.97%-26.57%24.40%23.62%29.17%-4.67%28.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FAGCX and FNIAX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2003

0.92

The correlation between FAGCX and FNIAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAGCX vs. FNIAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAGCX
FAGCX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FAGCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAGCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAGCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FAGCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAGCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

FNIAX
FNIAX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
FNIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
FNIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAGCX vs. FNIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I (FAGCX) and Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class A (FNIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FAGCXFNIAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.36

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

2.73

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.81

12.10

-2.29

FAGCX vs. FNIAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAGCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the FNIAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAGCX and FNIAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FAGCXFNIAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

2.00

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.80

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.05

0.85

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.64

-0.12

Drawdowns

FAGCX vs. FNIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAGCX drawdown since its inception was -69.09%, which is greater than FNIAX's maximum drawdown of -49.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAGCX and FNIAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAGCXFNIAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.09%

-49.69%

-19.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.10%

-10.41%

-5.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.59%

-20.61%

-5.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.72%

-31.98%

-6.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.72%

-31.98%

-6.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-0.38%

+0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.75%

-7.23%

-11.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.29%

2.34%

+1.95%

Volatility

FAGCX vs. FNIAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I (FAGCX) has a higher volatility of 4.48% compared to Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class A (FNIAX) at 3.53%. This indicates that FAGCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAGCXFNIAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.48%

3.53%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.26%

10.80%

+3.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.26%

14.19%

+4.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.40%

19.05%

+6.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.49%

19.29%

+5.20%

FAGCX vs. FNIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAGCX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FNIAX's 0.93% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAGCX vs. FNIAX - Dividend Comparison

FAGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, less than FNIAX's 8.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAGCX
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I
3.14%3.67%0.00%0.00%11.34%14.14%7.31%7.69%14.30%8.00%15.78%16.11%
FNIAX
Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class A
8.54%8.96%5.85%6.18%17.12%12.66%8.14%6.48%13.78%7.61%4.99%4.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FAGCX and FNIAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FAGCX has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to FNIAX (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAGCX dropped -69.09% vs FNIAX's -49.69%.

FAGCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAGCX and FNIAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer