FAGAX vs. FSKAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class A (FAGAX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX).
FAGAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 3, 1996. FSKAX is managed by Fidelity.
Performance
FAGAX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FAGAX vs. FSKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAGAX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class A | -13.66% | 22.17% | 38.71% | 45.14% | -38.40% | 11.31% | 68.60% | 40.26% | 14.87% | 34.66% |
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund | -6.77% | 17.06% | 23.89% | 26.12% | -19.53% | 25.66% | 20.79% | 30.92% | -5.32% | 20.85% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAGAX achieves a -13.66% return, which is significantly lower than FSKAX's -6.77% return. Over the past 10 years, FAGAX has outperformed FSKAX with an annualized return of 18.64%, while FSKAX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.23% annualized return.
FAGAX
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- -9.95%
- YTD
- -13.66%
- 6M
- -12.33%
- 1Y
- 18.39%
- 3Y*
- 22.90%
- 5Y*
- 7.34%
- 10Y*
- 18.64%
FSKAX
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -7.69%
- YTD
- -6.77%
- 6M
- -4.56%
- 1Y
- 14.73%
- 3Y*
- 16.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.13%
- 10Y*
- 13.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FAGAX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAGAX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FAGAX vs. FSKAX — Risk / Return Rank
FAGAX
FSKAX
FAGAX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class A (FAGAX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAGAX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.75 | 0.83 | -0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.19 | 1.29 | -0.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.19 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 1.04 | -0.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.40 | 5.05 | -1.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAGAX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 | 0.83 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.59 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | 0.72 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.78 | -0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between FAGAX and FSKAX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FAGAX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison
FAGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.76%, more than FSKAX's 1.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAGAX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class A | 4.76% | 4.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.19% | 5.45% | 4.10% | 11.99% | 7.67% | 15.44% | 11.12% |
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund | 1.09% | 1.01% | 1.19% | 1.41% | 1.62% | 1.15% | 1.45% | 1.94% | 2.54% | 2.07% | 2.43% | 0.82% |
Drawdowns
FAGAX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAGAX drawdown since its inception was -65.24%, which is greater than FSKAX's maximum drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAGAX and FSKAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAGAX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.24% | -35.01% | -30.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.19% | -12.42% | -3.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.70% | -25.39% | -19.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.70% | -35.01% | -9.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.19% | -8.92% | -7.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.27% | -4.05% | -11.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.43% | 2.57% | +1.86% |
Volatility
FAGAX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class A (FAGAX) has a higher volatility of 6.78% compared to Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) at 4.42%. This indicates that FAGAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSKAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FAGAX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.78% | 4.42% | +2.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.04% | 9.40% | +4.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.01% | 18.50% | +5.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.80% | 17.38% | +7.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.78% | 18.42% | +5.36% |