PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAFDX vs. NASDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAFDX vs. NASDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A (FAFDX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAFDX achieves a -2.07% return, which is significantly lower than NASDX's 21.38% return. Over the past 10 years, FAFDX has underperformed NASDX with an annualized return of 13.28%, while NASDX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.58% annualized return.


FAFDX

1D
0.19%
1M
-0.14%
YTD
-2.07%
6M
1.39%
1Y
8.44%
3Y*
23.17%
5Y*
10.49%
10Y*
13.28%

NASDX

1D
0.47%
1M
10.94%
YTD
21.38%
6M
19.90%
1Y
42.08%
3Y*
32.65%
5Y*
20.44%
10Y*
22.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAFDX vs. NASDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAFDX
Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A
-2.07%14.91%39.01%14.03%-8.93%32.90%-0.25%33.77%-16.09%20.17%
NASDX
Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares
21.38%21.00%36.91%54.69%-32.57%27.32%48.59%38.22%-1.21%31.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FAFDX and NASDX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2000

0.63

The correlation between FAFDX and NASDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAFDX vs. NASDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAFDX
FAFDX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
FAFDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAFDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAFDX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
FAFDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAFDX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

NASDX
NASDX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
NASDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NASDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
NASDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
NASDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
NASDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAFDX vs. NASDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A (FAFDX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FAFDXNASDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.46

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.70

3.65

-2.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.00

14.16

-12.16

FAFDX vs. NASDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAFDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the NASDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAFDX and NASDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FAFDXNASDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

2.70

-2.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.89

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

1.00

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.33

-0.02

Drawdowns

FAFDX vs. NASDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAFDX drawdown since its inception was -75.69%, smaller than the maximum NASDX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAFDX and NASDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAFDXNASDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.69%

-83.16%

+7.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.04%

-11.90%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.41%

-22.71%

+3.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.14%

-35.33%

+10.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.99%

-35.33%

-10.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.02%

0.00%

-5.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.65%

-34.37%

+16.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.55%

3.06%

+1.49%

Volatility

FAFDX vs. NASDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A (FAFDX) is 3.38%, while Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX) has a volatility of 4.51%. This indicates that FAFDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NASDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAFDXNASDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.38%

4.51%

-1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.78%

12.19%

-0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.86%

16.10%

-0.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.09%

23.06%

-1.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.85%

22.68%

+1.17%

FAFDX vs. NASDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAFDX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than NASDX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAFDX vs. NASDX - Dividend Comparison

FAFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.08%, more than NASDX's 2.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAFDX
Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A
7.08%6.93%9.59%2.29%5.93%4.21%2.47%1.21%4.00%0.06%0.21%0.53%
NASDX
Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares
2.98%3.76%16.95%7.61%3.75%2.59%1.28%7.09%2.47%1.65%0.75%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAFDX and NASDX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NASDX has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to FAFDX (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAFDX dropped -75.69% vs NASDX's -83.16%.

NASDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAFDX and NASDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer