FAERX vs. FSPGX
FAERX (Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class M) and FSPGX (Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund) are both mutual funds - FAERX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FSPGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FAERX returned 2.69%/yr vs 12.63%/yr for FSPGX. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FAERX charges 1.65%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for FSPGX.
Performance
FAERX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FAERX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- -3.17%
- 3Y*
- 7.25%
- 5Y*
- 2.69%
- 10Y*
- 7.31%
FSPGX
- 1D
- -1.93%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 2.43%
- YTD
- 3.03%
- 1Y
- 13.95%
- 3Y*
- 20.83%
- 5Y*
- 12.63%
- 10Y*
- —
FAERX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAERX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class M | 0.00% | 14.70% | 4.40% | 19.78% | -24.77% | 18.63% | 14.43% | 27.14% | -15.25% | 29.37% |
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund | 3.03% | 18.54% | 33.27% | 42.77% | -29.17% | 27.57% | 38.46% | 36.38% | -1.79% | 27.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAERX and FSPGX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.68 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FAERX and FSPGX has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAERX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank
FAERX
FSPGX
FAERX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class M (FAERX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FAERX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.16 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.50 | 0.89 | -1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.78 | 2.81 | -3.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FAERX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAERX drawdown since its inception was -60.14%, which is greater than FSPGX's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAERX and FSPGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAERX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.14% | -32.66% | -27.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.29% | -16.17% | +8.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.00% | -23.32% | +9.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.62% | -32.66% | -3.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.89% | -5.49% | -0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.35% | -6.35% | -8.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.34% | 5.10% | -0.76% |
Volatility
FAERX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class M (FAERX) is 0.00%, while Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) has a volatility of 6.50%. This indicates that FAERX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAERX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 6.50% | -6.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.59% | 13.40% | -10.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.29% | 16.75% | -8.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.70% | 21.72% | -5.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.29% | 21.57% | -5.28% |
FAERX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAERX has a 1.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAERX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison
FAERX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.94%, more than FSPGX's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAERX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class M | 7.94% | 7.94% | 0.96% | 0.51% | 0.12% | 2.07% | 0.00% | 1.15% | 4.25% | 3.35% | 0.80% | 0.09% |
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.38% | 0.34% | 0.37% | 0.73% | 0.86% | 2.22% | 1.76% | 1.04% | 1.32% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAERX and FSPGX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSPGX has higher volatility (6.50%) compared to FAERX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAERX dropped -60.14% vs FSPGX's -32.66%.
FSPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FAERX and FSPGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer