FAERX vs. FHLFX
FAERX (Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class M) and FHLFX (Fidelity Series International Index Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FAERX returned 3.03%/yr vs 8.50%/yr for FHLFX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FAERX charges 1.65%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for FHLFX.
Performance
FAERX vs. FHLFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FAERX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- -2.43%
- 3Y*
- 8.31%
- 5Y*
- 3.03%
- 10Y*
- 6.87%
FHLFX
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 2.18%
- YTD
- 8.67%
- 6M
- 10.92%
- 1Y
- 20.95%
- 3Y*
- 16.87%
- 5Y*
- 8.50%
- 10Y*
- —
FAERX vs. FHLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAERX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class M | 0.00% | 14.70% | 4.40% | 19.78% | -24.77% | 18.63% | 14.43% | 27.14% | -13.69% |
FHLFX Fidelity Series International Index Fund | 8.67% | 31.96% | 3.67% | 18.16% | -14.17% | 11.23% | 8.09% | 21.66% | -10.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAERX and FHLFX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2018 | 0.91 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FAERX and FHLFX has dropped to 0.58 - well below their long-term average of 0.91, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAERX vs. FHLFX — Risk / Return Rank
FAERX
FHLFX
FAERX vs. FHLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class M (FAERX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAERX | FHLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.27 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.30 | 1.90 | -2.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.51 | 7.13 | -7.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAERX | FHLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 | 1.46 | -1.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.53 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.52 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
FAERX vs. FHLFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAERX drawdown since its inception was -60.14%, which is greater than FHLFX's maximum drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAERX and FHLFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAERX | FHLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.14% | -33.58% | -26.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.29% | -11.37% | +4.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.00% | -13.62% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.62% | -29.36% | -7.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.89% | -1.20% | -4.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.37% | -6.11% | -8.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.01% | 3.03% | +0.98% |
Volatility
FAERX vs. FHLFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class M (FAERX) is 0.00%, while Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) has a volatility of 4.57%. This indicates that FAERX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAERX | FHLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 4.57% | -4.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.97% | 12.10% | -8.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.16% | 14.83% | -5.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.73% | 15.98% | +0.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.69% | 17.64% | -0.95% |
FAERX vs. FHLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAERX has a 1.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLFX's 0.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAERX vs. FHLFX - Dividend Comparison
FAERX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.94%, more than FHLFX's 3.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAERX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class M | 7.94% | 7.94% | 0.96% | 0.51% | 0.12% | 2.07% | 0.00% | 1.15% | 4.25% | 3.35% | 0.80% | 0.09% |
FHLFX Fidelity Series International Index Fund | 3.19% | 3.46% | 2.98% | 2.86% | 2.60% | 2.47% | 1.92% | 1.95% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAERX and FHLFX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FHLFX has higher volatility (4.57%) compared to FAERX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAERX dropped -60.14% vs FHLFX's -33.58%.
FHLFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FAERX and FHLFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer