FADTX vs. EPGAX

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

FADTX (Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class A) and EPGAX (Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class A) are both mutual funds - FADTX is a Technology Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while EPGAX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.97% expense ratio.

Performance

FADTX vs. EPGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class A (FADTX) and Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class A (EPGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FADTX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EPGAX

• 1D: 2.41%
• 1M: -2.18%
• YTD: 9.95%
• 6M: 11.02%
• 1Y: 22.35%
• 3Y*: 17.84%
• 5Y*: 10.31%
• 10Y*: 17.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FADTX vs. EPGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FADTX Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class A	0.00%	24.35%	35.02%	59.29%	-36.17%	27.26%	63.93%	50.57%	-8.52%	49.42%
EPGAX Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class A	9.95%	14.27%	15.57%	35.25%	-24.67%	22.66%	43.38%	33.69%	-0.04%	34.83%

Correlation

The correlation between FADTX and EPGAX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 1996	0.90

Over the past year, the correlation between FADTX and EPGAX has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.90, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FADTX vs. EPGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FADTX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EPGAX

EPGAX Risk / Return Rank: 33
EPGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
EPGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
EPGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
EPGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
EPGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FADTX vs. EPGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class A (FADTX) and Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class A (EPGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FADTX	EPGAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.31	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.81	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.24	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.79	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	6.64	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FADTX	EPGAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-63.20%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.67%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-30.60%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.60%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.17%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-4.68%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-16.23%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.40%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FADTX	EPGAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.93%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.97%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	17.25%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	20.92%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	20.90%	—

FADTX vs. EPGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FADTX and EPGAX have an expense ratio of 0.97%.

Dividends

FADTX vs. EPGAX - Dividend Comparison

FADTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EPGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EPGAX Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class A	0.56%	0.62%	0.00%	0.56%	2.26%	12.86%	12.06%	9.56%	7.10%	12.35%	6.39%	2.37%
FADTX Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class A	11.13%	11.13%	8.01%	3.94%	3.72%	12.63%	7.85%	2.52%	23.98%	8.23%	1.63%	4.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FADTX and EPGAX in my portfolio?

FADTX and EPGAX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.