FADMX vs. FBGRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX).
FADMX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 31, 1994. FBGRX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 31, 1987.
Performance
FADMX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FADMX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FADMX Fidelity Strategic Income Fund | -0.31% | 9.01% | 6.07% | 9.55% | -11.84% | 3.46% | 6.72% | 11.06% | -2.02% |
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | -7.12% | 19.91% | 39.77% | 55.61% | -38.45% | 22.64% | 62.20% | 33.43% | -3.36% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FADMX achieves a -0.31% return, which is significantly higher than FBGRX's -7.12% return.
FADMX
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -1.88%
- YTD
- -0.31%
- 6M
- 0.90%
- 1Y
- 7.44%
- 3Y*
- 6.98%
- 5Y*
- 2.87%
- 10Y*
- —
FBGRX
- 1D
- 4.54%
- 1M
- -5.07%
- YTD
- -7.12%
- 6M
- -4.04%
- 1Y
- 26.78%
- 3Y*
- 26.54%
- 5Y*
- 11.74%
- 10Y*
- 19.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FADMX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FADMX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FADMX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank
FADMX
FBGRX
FADMX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FADMX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.20 | 1.13 | +1.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.08 | 1.73 | +1.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.25 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | 2.00 | +1.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.17 | 7.92 | +4.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FADMX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.20 | 1.13 | +1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.47 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.65 | +0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between FADMX and FBGRX is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FADMX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison
FADMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, more than FBGRX's 2.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FADMX Fidelity Strategic Income Fund | 4.04% | 4.33% | 4.21% | 4.31% | 2.91% | 4.23% | 3.82% | 4.34% | 2.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | 2.05% | 1.90% | 5.95% | 0.93% | 0.57% | 8.73% | 6.40% | 3.70% | 6.32% | 4.23% | 4.05% | 5.30% |
Drawdowns
FADMX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FADMX drawdown since its inception was -15.98%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FADMX and FBGRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FADMX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.98% | -58.64% | +42.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.62% | -13.89% | +11.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.98% | -43.08% | +27.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.04% | -8.68% | +6.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.12% | -12.58% | +9.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.67% | 3.51% | -2.84% |
Volatility
FADMX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX) is 1.69%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a volatility of 7.83%. This indicates that FADMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FADMX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.69% | 7.83% | -6.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.44% | 14.08% | -11.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.58% | 24.98% | -21.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.44% | 24.93% | -20.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.77% | 23.63% | -18.86% |