FACGX vs. VONG
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class C (FACGX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG).
FACGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 3, 1997. VONG is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2010.
Performance
FACGX vs. VONG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FACGX vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FACGX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class C | -9.71% | 21.26% | 37.68% | 44.06% | -38.87% | 10.46% | 67.34% | 39.19% | 14.13% | 33.63% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | -8.97% | 18.45% | 33.20% | 42.67% | -29.18% | 27.60% | 38.30% | 36.06% | -1.53% | 30.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FACGX achieves a -9.71% return, which is significantly lower than VONG's -8.97% return. Over the past 10 years, FACGX has outperformed VONG with an annualized return of 18.32%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively lower 16.75% annualized return.
FACGX
- 1D
- 4.76%
- 1M
- -5.87%
- YTD
- -9.71%
- 6M
- -8.85%
- 1Y
- 21.80%
- 3Y*
- 23.89%
- 5Y*
- 7.10%
- 10Y*
- 18.32%
VONG
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -4.62%
- YTD
- -8.97%
- 6M
- -8.47%
- 1Y
- 18.72%
- 3Y*
- 21.47%
- 5Y*
- 12.55%
- 10Y*
- 16.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FACGX vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FACGX has a 1.80% expense ratio, which is higher than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FACGX vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank
FACGX
VONG
FACGX vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class C (FACGX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FACGX | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.95 | 0.84 | +0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.46 | 1.36 | +0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.19 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 1.22 | +0.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.95 | 4.16 | +0.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FACGX | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 0.84 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.59 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 0.81 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.84 | -0.42 |
Correlation
The correlation between FACGX and VONG is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FACGX vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison
FACGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.82%, more than VONG's 0.50% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FACGX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class C | 5.82% | 5.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.75% | 6.13% | 4.87% | 14.01% | 8.00% | 17.39% | 12.23% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.50% | 0.45% | 0.55% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 0.58% | 0.77% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 1.47% |
Drawdowns
FACGX vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FACGX drawdown since its inception was -65.53%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FACGX and VONG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FACGX | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.53% | -32.72% | -32.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.45% | -16.23% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.17% | -32.72% | -12.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.17% | -32.72% | -12.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.47% | -12.29% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.21% | -4.90% | -11.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.58% | 4.78% | -0.20% |
Volatility
FACGX vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class C (FACGX) has a higher volatility of 8.51% compared to Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) at 6.81%. This indicates that FACGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FACGX | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.51% | 6.81% | +1.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.81% | 12.37% | +2.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.42% | 22.42% | +2.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.88% | 21.35% | +3.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.83% | 20.82% | +3.01% |