FACGX vs. FAGCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class C (FACGX) and Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I (FAGCX).
FACGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 3, 1997. FAGCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 3, 1995.
Performance
FACGX vs. FAGCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FACGX vs. FAGCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FACGX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class C | -9.71% | 21.26% | 37.68% | 44.06% | -38.87% | 10.46% | 67.34% | 39.19% | 14.13% | 33.63% |
FAGCX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I | -9.48% | 22.47% | 39.06% | 45.51% | -32.60% | 16.63% | 74.20% | 47.51% | 19.08% | 37.70% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FACGX having a -9.71% return and FAGCX slightly higher at -9.48%. Over the past 10 years, FACGX has underperformed FAGCX with an annualized return of 18.32%, while FAGCX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.70% annualized return.
FACGX
- 1D
- 4.76%
- 1M
- -5.87%
- YTD
- -9.71%
- 6M
- -8.85%
- 1Y
- 21.80%
- 3Y*
- 23.89%
- 5Y*
- 7.10%
- 10Y*
- 18.32%
FAGCX
- 1D
- 4.77%
- 1M
- -5.79%
- YTD
- -9.48%
- 6M
- -8.40%
- 1Y
- 23.02%
- 3Y*
- 25.13%
- 5Y*
- 10.36%
- 10Y*
- 22.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FACGX vs. FAGCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FACGX has a 1.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FAGCX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FACGX vs. FAGCX — Risk / Return Rank
FACGX
FAGCX
FACGX vs. FAGCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class C (FACGX) and Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I (FAGCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FACGX | FAGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.95 | 1.00 | -0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.46 | 1.53 | -0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.22 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 1.48 | -0.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.95 | 5.36 | -0.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FACGX | FAGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 1.00 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.41 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 0.93 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.48 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between FACGX and FAGCX is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FACGX vs. FAGCX - Dividend Comparison
FACGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.82%, more than FAGCX's 4.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FACGX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class C | 5.82% | 5.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.75% | 6.13% | 4.87% | 14.01% | 8.00% | 17.39% | 12.23% |
FAGCX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I | 4.05% | 3.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.34% | 14.14% | 7.31% | 7.69% | 14.30% | 8.00% | 15.78% | 16.11% |
Drawdowns
FACGX vs. FAGCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FACGX drawdown since its inception was -65.53%, smaller than the maximum FAGCX drawdown of -69.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FACGX and FAGCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FACGX | FAGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.53% | -69.09% | +3.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.45% | -16.10% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.17% | -38.72% | -6.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.17% | -38.72% | -6.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.47% | -12.10% | -0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.21% | -18.84% | +2.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.58% | 4.46% | +0.12% |
Volatility
FACGX vs. FAGCX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class C (FACGX) and Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I (FAGCX) have volatilities of 8.51% and 8.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FACGX | FAGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.51% | 8.51% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.81% | 14.81% | 0.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.42% | 24.42% | 0.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.88% | 25.44% | -0.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.83% | 24.42% | -0.59% |