PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FACFX vs. FSPGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FACFX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class A (FACFX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FACFX achieves a 4.89% return, which is significantly lower than FSPGX's 8.60% return.


FACFX

1D
0.26%
1M
1.71%
YTD
4.89%
6M
5.19%
1Y
11.75%
3Y*
8.59%
5Y*
3.30%
10Y*
5.49%

FSPGX

1D
-0.38%
1M
7.10%
YTD
8.60%
6M
7.98%
1Y
27.43%
3Y*
25.53%
5Y*
16.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FACFX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FACFX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class A
4.89%10.98%4.95%9.21%-13.39%5.17%10.64%14.49%-3.60%11.40%
FSPGX
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund
8.60%18.54%33.27%42.77%-29.17%27.57%38.46%36.38%-1.79%27.70%

Correlation

The correlation between FACFX and FSPGX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.73

The correlation between FACFX and FSPGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (3 years) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FACFX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FACFX
FACFX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FACFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FACFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FACFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FACFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
FACFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FSPGX
FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FACFX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class A (FACFX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FACFXFSPGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.41

1.85

+0.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.52

2.50

+1.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.32

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

1.76

+1.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.30

5.90

+6.40

FACFX vs. FSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FACFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is higher than the FSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FACFX and FSPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FACFXFSPGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

1.85

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.75

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.90

-0.36

Drawdowns

FACFX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FACFX drawdown since its inception was -38.27%, which is greater than FSPGX's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FACFX and FSPGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FACFXFSPGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.27%

-32.66%

-5.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.15%

-16.17%

+12.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.81%

-23.32%

+17.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.61%

-32.66%

+14.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.38%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.07%

-6.37%

+2.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

4.81%

-3.85%

Volatility

FACFX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class A (FACFX) is 1.94%, while Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) has a volatility of 3.32%. This indicates that FACFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FACFXFSPGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.94%

3.32%

-1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.12%

11.58%

-7.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.90%

15.39%

-10.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.37%

21.49%

-15.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.34%

21.55%

-15.21%

FACFX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FACFX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FACFX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison

FACFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, more than FSPGX's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FACFX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 Fund Class A
4.84%4.94%2.77%2.48%7.06%8.79%5.79%5.73%8.86%6.38%4.63%3.96%
FSPGX
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund
0.32%0.34%0.37%0.73%0.86%2.22%1.76%1.04%1.32%0.22%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FACFX and FSPGX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSPGX has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to FACFX (1.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FACFX dropped -38.27% vs FSPGX's -32.66%.

FACFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FACFX and FSPGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer