PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FABZX vs. ^CASHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

FABZX vs. ^CASHX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FABZX (Franklin K2 Alternative Strategies Fund) is Multistrategy fund managed by Franklin Templeton, while ^CASHX (US Money Market Index) is an index. Over the past 10 years, FABZX returned 4.36%/yr vs 2.31%/yr for ^CASHX. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

FABZX vs. ^CASHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin K2 Alternative Strategies Fund (FABZX) and US Money Market Index (^CASHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FABZX achieves a 5.31% return, which is significantly higher than ^CASHX's 1.51% return. Over the past 10 years, FABZX has outperformed ^CASHX with an annualized return of 4.36%, while ^CASHX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.31% annualized return.

FABZX

1D
0.09%
1M
1.47%
YTD
5.31%
6M
5.40%
1Y
11.79%
3Y*
9.25%
5Y*
4.02%
10Y*
4.36%

^CASHX

1D
0.01%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.51%
6M
1.79%
1Y
3.91%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
3.51%
10Y*
2.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FABZX vs. ^CASHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FABZX
Franklin K2 Alternative Strategies Fund		5.31%8.48%11.60%2.86%-7.86%2.85%7.36%7.42%-2.18%6.85%
^CASHX
US Money Market Index		1.51%4.21%5.16%5.03%1.68%0.08%0.37%2.16%1.83%1.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FABZX and ^CASHX is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2013

-0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Franklin K2 Alternative Strategies Fund

US Money Market Index

Often compared with FABZX:
FABZX vs. BIMBXFABZX vs. QSPRXFABZX vs. SRRIXFABZX vs. QRPRXFABZX vs. TALTXFABZX vs. ARBIXFABZX vs. QRPNX
Often compared with ^CASHX:
^CASHX vs. SPAXX^CASHX vs. VBIL^CASHX vs. VUSXX^CASHX vs. VMRXX^CASHX vs. SWVXX^CASHX vs. FXNAX^CASHX vs. JAAA

Return for Risk

FABZX vs. ^CASHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FABZX
FABZX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FABZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FABZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FABZX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FABZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FABZX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
^CASHX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FABZX vs. ^CASHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin K2 Alternative Strategies Fund (FABZX) and US Money Market Index (^CASHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

FABZX^CASHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
3.13
257.89

-254.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
4.76

—

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

—

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.07

—

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.19

—

—

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FABZX vs. ^CASHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FABZX Sharpe Ratio is 3.13, which is lower than the ^CASHX Sharpe Ratio of 257.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FABZX and ^CASHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

FABZX^CASHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.13

257.89

-254.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

36.51

-35.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.07

23.97

-22.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

25.99

-24.99

Drawdowns

FABZX vs. ^CASHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FABZX drawdown since its inception was -11.03%, which is greater than ^CASHX's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FABZX and ^CASHX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FABZX^CASHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.03%

0.00%

-11.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.49%

0.00%

-1.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.50%

0.00%

-3.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.03%

0.00%

-11.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.03%

0.00%

-11.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.39%

0.00%

-2.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.42%

0.00%

+0.42%

Volatility

FABZX vs. ^CASHX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin K2 Alternative Strategies Fund (FABZX) has a higher volatility of 1.16% compared to US Money Market Index (^CASHX) at 0.00%. This indicates that FABZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^CASHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FABZX^CASHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.16%

0.00%

+1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.98%

0.00%

+2.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.86%

0.01%

+3.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.88%

0.08%

+3.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.08%

0.08%

+4.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

FABZX and ^CASHX have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FABZX has higher volatility (1.16%) compared to ^CASHX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FABZX dropped -11.03% vs ^CASHX's 0.00%.

^CASHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (257.89 vs 3.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FABZX and ^CASHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer