PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FABLX vs. NWQIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FABLX vs. NWQIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A (FABLX) and Nuveen Flexible Income Fund (NWQIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FABLX

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

NWQIX

1D
-0.35%
1M
-0.57%
6M
3.90%
YTD
4.90%
1Y
11.83%
3Y*
9.96%
5Y*
4.06%
10Y*
5.21%
ALL TIME*
5.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FABLX vs. NWQIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FABLX
Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A
0.00%0.00%14.56%21.21%-18.52%17.88%22.13%23.76%-4.42%15.75%
NWQIX
Nuveen Flexible Income Fund
4.90%11.74%6.03%11.61%-13.64%4.94%5.54%18.57%-4.07%9.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FABLX and NWQIX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2010

0.62

The correlation between FABLX and NWQIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (3 years) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FABLX vs. NWQIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FABLX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


NWQIX
NWQIX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
NWQIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWQIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWQIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
NWQIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWQIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FABLX vs. NWQIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A (FABLX) and Nuveen Flexible Income Fund (NWQIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FABLXNWQIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.93

FABLX vs. NWQIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FABLX vs. NWQIX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FABLXNWQIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.63%

Volatility

FABLX vs. NWQIX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FABLXNWQIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.29%

FABLX vs. NWQIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FABLX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than NWQIX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

FABLX vs. NWQIX - Dividend Comparison

FABLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NWQIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.55%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FABLX
Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A
0.00%0.00%3.87%1.48%5.38%6.92%4.31%2.86%7.72%6.16%1.64%5.17%
NWQIX
Nuveen Flexible Income Fund
5.55%6.09%5.20%7.84%7.02%4.39%4.82%5.71%6.23%5.67%5.52%5.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


FABLX and NWQIX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FABLX and NWQIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer