PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAAR vs. NFTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAAR vs. NFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAAR achieves a 17.40% return, which is significantly higher than NFTY's -6.42% return. Over the past 10 years, FAAR has underperformed NFTY with an annualized return of 4.54%, while NFTY has yielded a comparatively higher 8.46% annualized return.


FAAR

1D
-1.46%
1M
-6.59%
YTD
17.40%
6M
17.10%
1Y
28.26%
3Y*
10.03%
5Y*
7.50%
10Y*
4.54%

NFTY

1D
0.95%
1M
1.96%
YTD
-6.42%
6M
-6.00%
1Y
-6.40%
3Y*
6.64%
5Y*
5.92%
10Y*
8.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAAR vs. NFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAAR
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
17.40%8.07%5.97%-5.63%10.15%12.34%8.60%-1.28%-9.17%5.00%
NFTY
First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF
-6.42%5.47%5.18%24.00%-3.46%26.83%10.04%0.58%-1.51%21.78%

Correlation

The correlation between FAAR and NFTY is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2016

0.03

The correlation between FAAR and NFTY shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.03 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAAR vs. NFTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAAR
FAAR Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FAAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAAR Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FAAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAAR Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

NFTY
NFTY Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
NFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
NFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAAR vs. NFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FAARNFTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

0.94

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.71

-0.40

+4.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.66

-0.97

+15.64

FAAR vs. NFTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAAR Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the NFTY Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAAR and NFTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FAAR vs. NFTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAAR drawdown since its inception was -18.03%, smaller than the maximum NFTY drawdown of -47.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAAR and NFTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAARNFTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.03%

-47.67%

+29.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.66%

-16.14%

+8.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.54%

-21.55%

+10.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.03%

-21.55%

+3.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.03%

-47.67%

+29.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.66%

-14.45%

+6.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.82%

-9.60%

+1.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

6.58%

-4.65%

Volatility

FAAR vs. NFTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) is 2.82%, while First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY) has a volatility of 4.32%. This indicates that FAAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAARNFTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

4.32%

-1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.80%

12.64%

-2.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.30%

14.77%

-1.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.97%

17.41%

-4.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.55%

20.71%

-9.16%

FAAR vs. NFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAAR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAAR vs. NFTY - Dividend Comparison

FAAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.80%, more than NFTY's 1.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAAR
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
9.80%11.63%3.45%3.20%5.82%6.49%3.05%1.02%0.58%2.83%0.00%0.00%
NFTY
First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF
1.89%1.24%1.61%0.13%5.89%1.53%0.61%0.97%0.00%4.10%3.28%4.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAAR and NFTY have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NFTY has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to FAAR (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAAR dropped -18.03% vs NFTY's -47.67%.

On 10-year performance, NFTY leads with 8.46% vs 4.54% for FAAR. On fees, NFTY is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, FAAR has been the lower-risk option at 2.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, NFTY has performed better with a 8.46% return vs 4.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NFTY is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FAAR.

FAAR has the higher dividend yield at 9.80%, compared with 1.89% for NFTY.

FAAR is categorized as Commodities, while NFTY is Asia Pacific Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FAAR and 0.80% for NFTY.

FAAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAAR and NFTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer