FAAR vs. BNDI
FAAR (First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF) and BNDI (Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FAAR is a Commodities fund actively managed by First Trust, while BNDI is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FAAR returned 11.79%/yr vs 4.83%/yr for BNDI. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. FAAR charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for BNDI.
Performance
FAAR vs. BNDI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAAR achieves a 25.73% return, which is significantly higher than BNDI's 1.29% return.
FAAR
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -0.79%
- YTD
- 25.73%
- 6M
- 23.17%
- 1Y
- 40.73%
- 3Y*
- 11.79%
- 5Y*
- 8.07%
- 10Y*
- 5.17%
BNDI
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 7.00%
- 3Y*
- 4.83%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FAAR vs. BNDI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF | 25.73% | 8.07% | 5.97% | -5.63% | -3.58% |
BNDI Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF | 1.29% | 7.95% | 1.74% | 6.89% | -2.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAAR and BNDI is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2022 | -0.10 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between FAAR and BNDI has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.10 to -0.31, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
FAAR vs. BNDI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FAAR
BNDI
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
FAAR
BNDI
Basic Materials
FAAR
-
BNDI
Communication Services
FAAR
-
BNDI
Consumer Cyclical
FAAR
-
BNDI
Consumer Defensive
FAAR
-
BNDI
Energy
FAAR
-
BNDI
Healthcare
FAAR
-
BNDI
Industrials
FAAR
-
BNDI
Real Estate
FAAR
-
BNDI
Technology
FAAR
-
BNDI
Utilities
FAAR
-
BNDI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAAR vs. BNDI — Risk / Return Rank
FAAR
BNDI
FAAR vs. BNDI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) and Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF (BNDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAAR | BNDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.04 | 1.69 | +1.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.23 | 2.54 | +1.69 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.30 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.44 | 2.56 | +5.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.64 | 9.12 | +14.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAAR | BNDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.04 | 1.69 | +1.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.65 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
FAAR vs. BNDI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAAR drawdown since its inception was -18.03%, which is greater than BNDI's maximum drawdown of -6.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAAR and BNDI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAAR | BNDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.03% | -6.98% | -11.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.85% | -2.75% | -2.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.54% | -5.83% | -5.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.11% | -0.84% | -0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.85% | -1.71% | -6.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.73% | 0.77% | +0.96% |
Volatility
FAAR vs. BNDI - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) has a higher volatility of 2.44% compared to Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF (BNDI) at 1.38%. This indicates that FAAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNDI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAAR | BNDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.44% | 1.38% | +1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.72% | 3.08% | +6.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.48% | 4.17% | +9.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.02% | 6.19% | +6.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.51% | 6.19% | +5.32% |
FAAR vs. BNDI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAAR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDI's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAAR vs. BNDI - Dividend Comparison
FAAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.15%, more than BNDI's 5.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDI Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF | 5.80% | 5.69% | 5.54% | 5.17% | 1.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF | 9.15% | 11.63% | 3.45% | 3.20% | 5.82% | 6.49% | 3.05% | 1.02% | 0.58% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAAR and BNDI have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FAAR has higher volatility (2.44%) compared to BNDI (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAAR dropped -18.03% vs BNDI's -6.98%.
On 3-year performance, FAAR leads with 11.79% vs 4.83% for BNDI. On fees, BNDI is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, BNDI has been the lower-risk option at 1.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FAAR has performed better with a 11.79% return vs 4.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BNDI is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FAAR.
FAAR has the higher dividend yield at 9.15%, compared with 5.80% for BNDI.
FAAR is categorized as Commodities, while BNDI is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FAAR and 0.58% for BNDI.
FAAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.04 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FAAR and BNDI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer