PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAAR vs. BNDI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAAR vs. BNDI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) and Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF (BNDI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAAR achieves a 25.73% return, which is significantly higher than BNDI's 1.29% return.


FAAR

1D
0.01%
1M
-0.79%
YTD
25.73%
6M
23.17%
1Y
40.73%
3Y*
11.79%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*
5.17%

BNDI

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.36%
YTD
1.29%
6M
1.22%
1Y
7.00%
3Y*
4.83%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAAR vs. BNDI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FAAR
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
25.73%8.07%5.97%-5.63%-3.58%
BNDI
Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF
1.29%7.95%1.74%6.89%-2.60%

Correlation

The correlation between FAAR and BNDI is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2022

-0.10

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between FAAR and BNDI has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.10 to -0.31, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

FAAR vs. BNDI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FAAR
BNDI

Financial Services

100.0%
11.8%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

3.5%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Industrials

-

8.3%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Technology

-

35.6%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Financial Services

FAAR
100.0%
BNDI
11.8%

Basic Materials

FAAR

-

BNDI
1.8%

Communication Services

FAAR

-

BNDI
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FAAR

-

BNDI
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

FAAR

-

BNDI
4.9%

Energy

FAAR

-

BNDI
3.5%

Healthcare

FAAR

-

BNDI
8.5%

Industrials

FAAR

-

BNDI
8.3%

Real Estate

FAAR

-

BNDI
1.9%

Technology

FAAR

-

BNDI
35.6%

Utilities

FAAR

-

BNDI
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAAR vs. BNDI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAAR
FAAR Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FAAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAAR Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FAAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAAR Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

BNDI
BNDI Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
BNDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDI Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDI Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAAR vs. BNDI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) and Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF (BNDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FAARBNDIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.04

1.69

+1.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.23

2.54

+1.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.30

+0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

8.44

2.56

+5.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

23.64

9.12

+14.52

FAAR vs. BNDI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAAR Sharpe Ratio is 3.04, which is higher than the BNDI Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAAR and BNDI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FAARBNDIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.04

1.69

+1.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.65

-0.20

Drawdowns

FAAR vs. BNDI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAAR drawdown since its inception was -18.03%, which is greater than BNDI's maximum drawdown of -6.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAAR and BNDI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAARBNDIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.03%

-6.98%

-11.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.85%

-2.75%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.54%

-5.83%

-5.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-0.84%

-0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.85%

-1.71%

-6.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

0.77%

+0.96%

Volatility

FAAR vs. BNDI - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) has a higher volatility of 2.44% compared to Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF (BNDI) at 1.38%. This indicates that FAAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNDI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAARBNDIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.44%

1.38%

+1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.72%

3.08%

+6.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.48%

4.17%

+9.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.02%

6.19%

+6.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.51%

6.19%

+5.32%

FAAR vs. BNDI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAAR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDI's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAAR vs. BNDI - Dividend Comparison

FAAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.15%, more than BNDI's 5.80% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BNDI
Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF
5.80%5.69%5.54%5.17%1.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FAAR
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
9.15%11.63%3.45%3.20%5.82%6.49%3.05%1.02%0.58%2.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAAR and BNDI have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAAR has higher volatility (2.44%) compared to BNDI (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAAR dropped -18.03% vs BNDI's -6.98%.

On 3-year performance, FAAR leads with 11.79% vs 4.83% for BNDI. On fees, BNDI is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, BNDI has been the lower-risk option at 1.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, FAAR has performed better with a 11.79% return vs 4.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BNDI is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FAAR.

FAAR has the higher dividend yield at 9.15%, compared with 5.80% for BNDI.

FAAR is categorized as Commodities, while BNDI is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FAAR and 0.58% for BNDI.

FAAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.04 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAAR and BNDI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer