FAAA vs. JA
FAAA (Fidelity AAA CLO ETF) and JA (Janus Henderson AA-A CLO ETF) are both CLO funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FAAA charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for JA.
Performance
FAAA vs. JA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FAAA
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FAAA vs. JA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FAAA Fidelity AAA CLO ETF | 2.12% |
JA Janus Henderson AA-A CLO ETF | 1.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAAA and JA is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAAA vs. JA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity AAA CLO ETF (FAAA) and Janus Henderson AA-A CLO ETF (JA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FAAA vs. JA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAAA drawdown since its inception was -0.55%, which is greater than JA's maximum drawdown of -0.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAAA and JA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAAA | JA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.55% | -0.51% | -0.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.06% | -0.05% | -0.01% |
Volatility
FAAA vs. JA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAAA | JA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84% | 1.44% | -0.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.84% | 1.44% | -0.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.84% | 1.44% | -0.60% |
FAAA vs. JA - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAAA has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than JA's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAAA vs. JA - Dividend Comparison
FAAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than JA's 1.72% yield.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
FAAA Fidelity AAA CLO ETF | 1.67% |
JA Janus Henderson AA-A CLO ETF | 1.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAAA and JA have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FAAA is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FAAA is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for JA.
JA has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 1.67% for FAAA.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for FAAA and 0.29% for JA.
Find the right allocation for FAAA and JA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer