PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAAA vs. DRLL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAAA vs. DRLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity AAA CLO ETF (FAAA) and Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FAAA

1D
0.03%
1M
0.47%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

DRLL

1D
-2.68%
1M
8.84%
6M
11.16%
YTD
29.95%
1Y
37.23%
3Y*
11.02%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$478.10K$507.89K$528.94K
$1.94M$1.70M$1.58M

FAAA vs. DRLL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)
FAAA
Fidelity AAA CLO ETF
2.39%
DRLL
Strive U.S. Energy ETF
7.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FAAA and DRLL is -0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2026

-0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAAA vs. DRLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FAAA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


DRLL
DRLL Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
DRLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRLL Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
DRLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRLL Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FAAA vs. DRLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity AAA CLO ETF (FAAA) and Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FAAADRLLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.57

FAAA vs. DRLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FAAA vs. DRLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAAA drawdown since its inception was -0.55%, smaller than the maximum DRLL drawdown of -23.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAAA and DRLL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAAADRLLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.55%

-23.73%

+23.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-9.02%

+9.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.05%

-8.14%

+8.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.71%

Volatility

FAAA vs. DRLL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAAADRLLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79%

23.14%

-22.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.79%

23.82%

-23.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.79%

23.82%

-23.03%

FAAA vs. DRLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAAA has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DRLL's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAAA vs. DRLL - Dividend Comparison

FAAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, less than DRLL's 2.34% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DRLL
Strive U.S. Energy ETF
2.34%2.99%3.00%3.01%1.18%
FAAA
Fidelity AAA CLO ETF
2.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAAA and DRLL have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FAAA is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FAAA is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DRLL.

DRLL has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 2.03% for FAAA.

FAAA is categorized as CLO, while DRLL is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for FAAA and 0.41% for DRLL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAAA and DRLL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer