F50A.DE vs. XDWL.DE
F50A.DE (Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating) and XDWL.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1D) are both Global Equities funds - F50A.DE tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while XDWL.DE tracks the MSCI World. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, F50A.DE returned 12.94%/yr vs 12.94%/yr for XDWL.DE. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. F50A.DE charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XDWL.DE.
Performance
F50A.DE vs. XDWL.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with F50A.DE having a 10.81% return and XDWL.DE slightly higher at 10.94%.
F50A.DE
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 3.68%
- YTD
- 10.81%
- 6M
- 10.16%
- 1Y
- 23.82%
- 3Y*
- 17.70%
- 5Y*
- 12.94%
- 10Y*
- —
XDWL.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.65%
- YTD
- 10.94%
- 6M
- 10.98%
- 1Y
- 23.78%
- 3Y*
- 17.62%
- 5Y*
- 12.94%
- 10Y*
- 12.83%
F50A.DE vs. XDWL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F50A.DE Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating | 10.81% | 8.58% | 25.85% | 19.91% | -13.61% | 32.73% | -0.41% |
XDWL.DE Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1D | 10.94% | 7.90% | 26.08% | 20.26% | -13.81% | 32.92% | -0.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between F50A.DE and XDWL.DE is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2020 | 0.91 |
The correlation between F50A.DE and XDWL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
F50A.DE vs. XDWL.DE — Risk / Return Rank
F50A.DE
XDWL.DE
F50A.DE vs. XDWL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating (F50A.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1D (XDWL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| F50A.DE | XDWL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.40 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | 3.66 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.61 | 14.44 | +0.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| F50A.DE | XDWL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | 2.14 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 | 0.91 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.68 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
F50A.DE vs. XDWL.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum F50A.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.88%, roughly equal to the maximum XDWL.DE drawdown of -33.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for F50A.DE and XDWL.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| F50A.DE | XDWL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.88% | -33.65% | +0.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.62% | -6.49% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.49% | -21.63% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.49% | -21.63% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -0.29% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.72% | -4.56% | -0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.66% | 1.65% | +0.01% |
Volatility
F50A.DE vs. XDWL.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating (F50A.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1D (XDWL.DE) have volatilities of 2.63% and 2.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| F50A.DE | XDWL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.63% | 2.62% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.95% | 7.73% | +0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.18% | 11.09% | +0.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.60% | 14.14% | +0.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.70% | 15.12% | +2.58% |
F50A.DE vs. XDWL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
F50A.DE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWL.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
F50A.DE vs. XDWL.DE - Dividend Comparison
F50A.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XDWL.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F50A.DE Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XDWL.DE Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1D | 1.17% | 1.28% | 1.65% | 1.58% | 1.77% | 2.08% | 1.95% | 1.98% | 1.40% | 1.94% | 1.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, F50A.DE and XDWL.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, F50A.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
F50A.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for XDWL.DE.
F50A.DE tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index, while XDWL.DE tracks MSCI World. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for F50A.DE and 0.12% for XDWL.DE.
Find the right allocation for F50A.DE and XDWL.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer