F50A.DE vs. CBUG.DE
F50A.DE (Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating) and CBUG.DE (iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist)) are both Global Equities funds - F50A.DE tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index while CBUG.DE tracks the MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, F50A.DE returned 25.52% vs 33.69% for CBUG.DE. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. F50A.DE charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for CBUG.DE.
Performance
F50A.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, F50A.DE achieves a 11.43% return, which is significantly lower than CBUG.DE's 18.13% return.
F50A.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.15%
- YTD
- 11.43%
- 6M
- 11.90%
- 1Y
- 25.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBUG.DE
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 4.21%
- YTD
- 18.13%
- 6M
- 18.13%
- 1Y
- 33.69%
- 3Y*
- 15.67%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
F50A.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
F50A.DE Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating | 11.43% | 8.58% | -1.22% |
CBUG.DE iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist) | 18.13% | 6.50% | -4.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between F50A.DE and CBUG.DE is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2024 | 0.82 |
The correlation between F50A.DE and CBUG.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
F50A.DE vs. CBUG.DE — Risk / Return Rank
F50A.DE
CBUG.DE
F50A.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating (F50A.DE) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist) (CBUG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| F50A.DE | CBUG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.43 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 4.63 | -3.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.77 | 17.68 | -14.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
F50A.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum F50A.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.49%, smaller than the maximum CBUG.DE drawdown of -24.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for F50A.DE and CBUG.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| F50A.DE | CBUG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.49% | -24.57% | +3.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.39% | -7.24% | -9.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.86% | 0.00% | -2.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.51% | -7.41% | -0.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.22% | 1.90% | +7.32% |
Volatility
F50A.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating (F50A.DE) is 3.04%, while iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist) (CBUG.DE) has a volatility of 3.37%. This indicates that F50A.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBUG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| F50A.DE | CBUG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.04% | 3.37% | -0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.25% | 10.00% | -1.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.38% | 13.98% | +10.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.69% | 16.66% | +6.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.69% | 16.66% | +6.03% |
F50A.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
F50A.DE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than CBUG.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
F50A.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither F50A.DE nor CBUG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
F50A.DE and CBUG.DE have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, F50A.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
F50A.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for CBUG.DE.
F50A.DE tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index, while CBUG.DE tracks MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for F50A.DE and 0.10% for CBUG.DE.
Find the right allocation for F50A.DE and CBUG.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer