EZU vs. FLEH

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EZU (iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF) and FLEH (Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - EZU tracks the MSCI EMU while FLEH tracks the FTSE Developed Europe RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EZU returned 9.40%/yr vs 11.75%/yr for FLEH. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EZU charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLEH.

Performance

EZU vs. FLEH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU) and Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF (FLEH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZU achieves a 7.97% return, which is significantly higher than FLEH's 7.40% return.

EZU

• 1D: -1.96%
• 1M: 1.76%
• YTD: 7.97%
• 6M: 7.97%
• 1Y: 21.16%
• 3Y*: 18.56%
• 5Y*: 9.40%
• 10Y*: 11.09%

FLEH

• 1D: -1.70%
• 1M: 1.76%
• YTD: 7.40%
• 6M: 7.90%
• 1Y: 20.48%
• 3Y*: 17.50%
• 5Y*: 11.75%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZU vs. FLEH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EZU iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF	7.97%	40.00%	2.23%	23.44%	-17.25%	13.92%	7.62%	23.27%	-16.76%	-0.61%
FLEH Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF	7.40%	41.56%	2.26%	16.21%	-9.14%	23.27%	0.95%	26.94%	-8.54%	-1.24%

Correlation

The correlation between EZU and FLEH is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017	0.82

The correlation between EZU and FLEH shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (all time) to 0.98 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EZU vs. FLEH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EZU	FLEH
Financial Services	23.8%	16.0%
Industrials	20.0%	15.3%
Technology	17.0%	7.5%
Consumer Cyclical	7.8%	10.8%
Utilities	6.3%	4.0%
Healthcare	5.7%	14.8%
Consumer Defensive	5.6%	12.1%
Communication Services	5.0%	3.4%
Basic Materials	3.9%	6.8%
Energy	3.8%	5.5%
Real Estate	0.7%	1.3%

Return for Risk

EZU vs. FLEH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZU

EZU Risk / Return Rank: 36
EZU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
EZU Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
EZU Omega Ratio Rank: 34
EZU Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
EZU Martin Ratio Rank: 39

FLEH

FLEH Risk / Return Rank: 35
FLEH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
FLEH Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
FLEH Omega Ratio Rank: 34
FLEH Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
FLEH Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZU vs. FLEH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU) and Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF (FLEH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EZU	FLEH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	1.18	+0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.79	1.75	+0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.22	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.63	1.53	+0.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.90	5.57	+0.33

EZU vs. FLEH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZU Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the FLEH Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZU and FLEH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EZU vs. FLEH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZU drawdown since its inception was -65.32%, which is greater than FLEH's maximum drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZU and FLEH.

Drawdown Indicators

	EZU	FLEH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.32%	-33.94%	-31.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.06%	-13.41%	+0.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.02%	-15.67%	+0.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.11%	-18.67%	-17.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.96%	-2.00%	+0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.20%	-4.68%	-14.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.60%	3.69%	-0.09%

Volatility

EZU vs. FLEH - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU) has a higher volatility of 5.94% compared to Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF (FLEH) at 5.38%. This indicates that EZU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLEH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EZU	FLEH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.94%	5.38%	+0.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.96%	15.05%	-0.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.52%	17.53%	-0.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.96%	16.47%	+3.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.14%	18.27%	+1.87%

EZU vs. FLEH - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZU has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than FLEH's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

EZU vs. FLEH - Dividend Comparison

EZU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, more than FLEH's 1.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EZU iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF	2.71%	2.85%	2.90%	2.56%	2.79%	2.46%	2.13%	2.84%	3.47%	1.91%	3.07%	2.18%
FLEH Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF	1.08%	2.22%	3.18%	3.25%	21.45%	3.03%	1.94%	6.06%	12.17%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EZU and FLEH in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, EZU and FLEH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, EZU or FLEH?

EZU has higher volatility (5.94%) compared to FLEH (5.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZU dropped -65.32% vs FLEH's -33.94%.

Which ETF is better, EZU or FLEH?

On 5-year performance, FLEH leads with 11.75% vs 9.40% for EZU. On fees, FLEH is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLEH has been the lower-risk option at 5.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EZU or FLEH?

Over the 5-year period, FLEH has performed better with a 11.75% return vs 9.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EZU or FLEH?

FLEH is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for EZU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EZU or FLEH?

EZU has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 1.08% for FLEH.

What is the main difference between EZU and FLEH?

EZU tracks MSCI EMU, while FLEH tracks FTSE Developed Europe RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for EZU and 0.09% for FLEH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EZU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.