EZU vs. BBEU
EZU (iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF) and BBEU (JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - EZU tracks the MSCI EMU while BBEU tracks the Morningstar Developed Europe Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EZU returned 9.36%/yr vs 9.22%/yr for BBEU. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. EZU charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for BBEU.
Performance
EZU vs. BBEU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZU achieves a 8.17% return, which is significantly higher than BBEU's 6.83% return.
EZU
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 3.97%
- YTD
- 8.17%
- 6M
- 11.21%
- 1Y
- 19.95%
- 3Y*
- 18.60%
- 5Y*
- 9.36%
- 10Y*
- 9.96%
BBEU
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 2.04%
- YTD
- 6.83%
- 6M
- 10.61%
- 1Y
- 18.82%
- 3Y*
- 16.97%
- 5Y*
- 9.22%
- 10Y*
- —
EZU vs. BBEU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZU iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF | 8.17% | 40.00% | 2.23% | 23.44% | -17.25% | 13.92% | 7.62% | 23.27% | -16.14% |
BBEU JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF | 6.83% | 36.37% | 1.85% | 20.31% | -14.72% | 17.50% | 5.00% | 23.96% | -13.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZU and BBEU is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2018 | 0.97 |
The correlation between EZU and BBEU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
EZU vs. BBEU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EZU
BBEU
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
EZU
BBEU
Industrials
EZU
BBEU
Technology
EZU
BBEU
Consumer Cyclical
EZU
BBEU
Utilities
EZU
BBEU
Healthcare
EZU
BBEU
Consumer Defensive
EZU
BBEU
Energy
EZU
BBEU
Basic Materials
EZU
BBEU
Communication Services
EZU
BBEU
Real Estate
EZU
BBEU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZU vs. BBEU — Risk / Return Rank
EZU
BBEU
EZU vs. BBEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF (BBEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EZU | BBEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.19 | 1.22 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.75 | 1.79 | -0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.22 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 1.64 | -0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.88 | 6.10 | -0.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EZU | BBEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 1.22 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.53 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.48 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
EZU vs. BBEU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZU drawdown since its inception was -65.32%, which is greater than BBEU's maximum drawdown of -36.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZU and BBEU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZU | BBEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.32% | -36.27% | -29.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.06% | -12.23% | -0.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.02% | -14.23% | -0.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.11% | -31.08% | -5.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.45% | +1.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.24% | -6.14% | -13.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.60% | 3.28% | +0.32% |
Volatility
EZU vs. BBEU - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU) has a higher volatility of 6.82% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF (BBEU) at 5.80%. This indicates that EZU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBEU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZU | BBEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.82% | 5.80% | +1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.07% | 12.92% | +1.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.89% | 15.46% | +1.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.85% | 17.48% | +2.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.49% | 19.32% | +1.17% |
EZU vs. BBEU - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZU has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than BBEU's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
EZU vs. BBEU - Dividend Comparison
EZU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, less than BBEU's 2.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBEU JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF | 2.78% | 2.83% | 4.16% | 2.94% | 4.72% | 2.63% | 2.29% | 3.24% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EZU iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF | 2.64% | 2.85% | 2.90% | 2.56% | 2.79% | 2.46% | 2.13% | 2.84% | 3.47% | 1.91% | 3.07% | 2.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, EZU and BBEU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
EZU has higher volatility (6.82%) compared to BBEU (5.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZU dropped -65.32% vs BBEU's -36.27%.
On 5-year performance, EZU leads with 9.36% vs 9.22% for BBEU. On fees, BBEU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, BBEU has been the lower-risk option at 5.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EZU has performed better with a 9.36% return vs 9.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBEU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for EZU.
BBEU has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 2.64% for EZU.
EZU tracks MSCI EMU, while BBEU tracks Morningstar Developed Europe Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for EZU and 0.09% for BBEU.
BBEU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EZU and BBEU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer