EZJ vs. SSO
EZJ (ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan) and SSO (ProShares Ultra S&P500) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - EZJ tracks the MSCI Japan Index (200%) while SSO tracks the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EZJ returned 10.56%/yr vs 24.16%/yr for SSO. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EZJ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for SSO.
Performance
EZJ vs. SSO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZJ achieves a 29.29% return, which is significantly higher than SSO's 20.20% return. Over the past 10 years, EZJ has underperformed SSO with an annualized return of 10.56%, while SSO has yielded a comparatively higher 24.16% annualized return.
EZJ
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 10.56%
- YTD
- 29.29%
- 6M
- 28.96%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 26.09%
- 5Y*
- 7.76%
- 10Y*
- 10.56%
SSO
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 8.84%
- YTD
- 20.20%
- 6M
- 19.43%
- 1Y
- 53.91%
- 3Y*
- 38.10%
- 5Y*
- 19.79%
- 10Y*
- 24.16%
EZJ vs. SSO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZJ ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan | 29.29% | 42.72% | 3.31% | 30.78% | -38.23% | -1.96% | 22.21% | 33.76% | -30.99% | 49.10% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 20.20% | 26.19% | 43.48% | 46.65% | -38.98% | 60.57% | 21.54% | 63.45% | -14.60% | 44.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZJ and SSO is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2009 | 0.62 |
The correlation between EZJ and SSO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
EZJ vs. SSO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EZJ
SSO
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
EZJ
SSO
Technology
EZJ
SSO
Financial Services
EZJ
SSO
Consumer Cyclical
EZJ
SSO
Communication Services
EZJ
SSO
Healthcare
EZJ
SSO
Consumer Defensive
EZJ
SSO
Basic Materials
EZJ
SSO
Real Estate
EZJ
SSO
Utilities
EZJ
SSO
Energy
EZJ
SSO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZJ vs. SSO — Risk / Return Rank
EZJ
SSO
EZJ vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EZJ | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.38 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 2.98 | -0.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.79 | 13.10 | -6.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EZJ | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | 2.30 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.59 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.68 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.42 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
EZJ vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZJ drawdown since its inception was -58.63%, smaller than the maximum SSO drawdown of -84.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZJ and SSO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZJ | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.63% | -84.67% | +26.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.78% | -18.17% | -8.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.48% | -35.21% | +3.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.63% | -46.73% | -11.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.63% | -59.34% | +0.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.87% | -0.71% | -3.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.28% | -19.57% | -1.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.72% | 4.13% | +4.59% |
Volatility
EZJ vs. SSO - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) has a higher volatility of 8.46% compared to ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) at 5.56%. This indicates that EZJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZJ | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.46% | 5.56% | +2.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.74% | 17.78% | +12.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.67% | 23.59% | +16.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.58% | 33.64% | +2.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.53% | 35.89% | -1.36% |
EZJ vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZJ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SSO's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
EZJ vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison
EZJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, more than SSO's 0.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZJ ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan | 1.60% | 1.13% | 2.09% | 1.11% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 4.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 0.61% | 0.68% | 0.85% | 0.18% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.50% | 0.75% | 0.39% | 0.51% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EZJ and SSO have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EZJ has higher volatility (8.46%) compared to SSO (5.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZJ dropped -58.63% vs SSO's -84.67%.
On 10-year performance, SSO leads with 24.16% vs 10.56% for EZJ. On fees, SSO is cheaper at 0.87% per year. On volatility, SSO has been the lower-risk option at 5.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SSO has performed better with a 24.16% return vs 10.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SSO is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EZJ.
EZJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 0.61% for SSO.
EZJ tracks MSCI Japan Index (200%), while SSO tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EZJ and 0.87% for SSO.
SSO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EZJ and SSO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer