EZJ vs. NTSD
EZJ (ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan) and NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. EZJ is passively managed, while NTSD is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EZJ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NTSD.
Performance
EZJ vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EZJ
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 27.24%
- 6M
- 26.38%
- 1Y
- 62.45%
- 3Y*
- 26.61%
- 5Y*
- 7.82%
- 10Y*
- 11.65%
NTSD
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -1.76%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZJ vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EZJ ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan | 20.10% |
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 15.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZJ and NTSD is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZJ vs. NTSD — Risk / Return Rank
EZJ
NTSD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EZJ vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EZJ | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.04 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EZJ vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZJ drawdown since its inception was -58.63%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZJ and NTSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZJ | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.63% | -5.58% | -53.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.74% | -2.96% | -4.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.23% | -1.15% | -20.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.90% | — | — |
Volatility
EZJ vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZJ | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.40% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.13% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.14% | 24.76% | +17.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.14% | 24.76% | +12.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.74% | 24.76% | +9.98% |
EZJ vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZJ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
EZJ vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison
EZJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, more than NTSD's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZJ ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan | 1.87% | 1.13% | 2.09% | 1.11% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 4.49% |
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EZJ and NTSD have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EZJ.
EZJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 0.14% for NTSD.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EZJ and 0.35% for NTSD.
Find the right allocation for EZJ and NTSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer