EZJ vs. DXJS
EZJ (ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan) and DXJS (WisdomTree Japan Hedged SmallCap Equity Fund) are both Japan Equities funds - EZJ tracks the MSCI Japan Index (200%) while DXJS tracks the WisdomTree Japan Hedged SmallCap Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EZJ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for DXJS.
Performance
EZJ vs. DXJS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EZJ
- 1D
- 3.68%
- 1M
- 2.34%
- 6M
- 12.88%
- YTD
- 29.20%
- 1Y
- 54.78%
- 3Y*
- 26.39%
- 5Y*
- 8.53%
- 10Y*
- 10.05%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.15%
DXJS
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $67.09K | $107.47K | $207.90K |
EZJ vs. DXJS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZJ ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan | 29.20% | 42.72% | 3.31% | 30.78% | -38.23% | -1.96% | 22.21% | 33.76% | -30.99% | 49.10% |
DXJS WisdomTree Japan Hedged SmallCap Equity Fund | 23.30% | 37.08% | 20.70% | 38.96% | 5.02% | 11.66% | -3.22% | 18.24% | -18.69% | 29.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZJ and DXJS is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2013 | 0.70 |
The correlation between EZJ and DXJS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZJ vs. DXJS — Risk / Return Rank
EZJ
DXJS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EZJ vs. DXJS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged SmallCap Equity Fund (DXJS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EZJ | DXJS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.91 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EZJ vs. DXJS - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZJ | DXJS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.31% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.16% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.30% | — | — |
Volatility
EZJ vs. DXJS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZJ | DXJS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.00% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.21% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.87% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.52% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.85% | — | — |
EZJ vs. DXJS - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZJ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DXJS's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
EZJ vs. DXJS - Dividend Comparison
EZJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, while DXJS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXJS WisdomTree Japan Hedged SmallCap Equity Fund | 0.53% | 1.78% | 4.02% | 2.71% | 2.63% | 2.96% | 3.04% | 2.17% | 2.06% | 1.53% | 1.66% | 3.61% |
EZJ ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan | 1.84% | 1.13% | 2.09% | 1.11% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 4.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EZJ and DXJS have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DXJS is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DXJS is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EZJ.
EZJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.84%, compared with 0.53% for DXJS.
EZJ tracks MSCI Japan Index (200%), while DXJS tracks WisdomTree Japan Hedged SmallCap Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EZJ and 0.58% for DXJS.
Find the right allocation for EZJ and DXJS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer