EZBC vs. GSUI
EZBC (Franklin Bitcoin ETF) and GSUI (Grayscale Sui Staking ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - EZBC tracks the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant while GSUI tracks the CoinDesk SUI Reference Rate. Both are passively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EZBC charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for GSUI.
Performance
EZBC vs. GSUI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZBC achieves a -23.26% return, which is significantly higher than GSUI's -39.27% return.
EZBC
- 1D
- -5.96%
- 1M
- -14.30%
- YTD
- -23.26%
- 6M
- -26.35%
- 1Y
- -35.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSUI
- 1D
- -6.40%
- 1M
- -10.85%
- YTD
- -39.27%
- 6M
- -46.25%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZBC vs. GSUI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF | -23.26% | -1.88% |
GSUI Grayscale Sui Staking ETF | -39.27% | -34.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZBC and GSUI is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | 0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZBC vs. GSUI — Risk / Return Rank
EZBC
GSUI
EZBC vs. GSUI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC) and Grayscale Sui Staking ETF (GSUI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EZBC | GSUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.09 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.27 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EZBC | GSUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | -0.78 | +1.10 |
Drawdowns
EZBC vs. GSUI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZBC drawdown since its inception was -49.37%, smaller than the maximum GSUI drawdown of -60.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZBC and GSUI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZBC | GSUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.37% | -60.30% | +10.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.58% | -60.30% | +13.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.96% | -43.68% | +27.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.26% | — | — |
Volatility
EZBC vs. GSUI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZBC | GSUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.72% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.80% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.59% | 108.20% | -64.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.07% | 108.20% | -58.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.07% | 108.20% | -58.13% |
EZBC vs. GSUI - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZBC has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than GSUI's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EZBC vs. GSUI - Dividend Comparison
Neither EZBC nor GSUI has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EZBC and GSUI have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GSUI is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GSUI is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for EZBC.
EZBC and GSUI have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
EZBC tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while GSUI tracks CoinDesk SUI Reference Rate. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZBC and 0.00% for GSUI.
Find the right allocation for EZBC and GSUI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer