EZBC vs. GLNK

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

EZBC (Franklin Bitcoin ETF) and GLNK (Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - EZBC tracks the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant while GLNK tracks the Chainlink (LINK). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EZBC returned -44.53% vs -73.63% for GLNK. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. EZBC charges 0.19%/yr vs 2.50%/yr for GLNK.

Performance

EZBC vs. GLNK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC) and Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF (GLNK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZBC achieves a -28.20% return, which is significantly higher than GLNK's -33.63% return.

EZBC

• 1D: -2.86%
• 1M: 2.28%
• 6M: -25.05%
• YTD: -28.20%
• 1Y: -44.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.49%

GLNK

• 1D: -4.11%
• 1M: 5.09%
• 6M: -24.29%
• YTD: -33.63%
• 1Y: -73.63%
• 3Y*: -20.97%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -2.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF	$3.11M	$3.63M	$7.00M
GLNK Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF	$2.63M	$1.89M	$1.97M

EZBC vs. GLNK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF	-28.20%	-6.56%	87.83%
GLNK Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF	-33.63%	-87.10%	5.60%

Correlation

The correlation between EZBC and GLNK is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024	0.45

Over the past year, EZBC and GLNK have become more correlated (0.72) than their long-term average of 0.45, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

EZBC vs. GLNK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EZBC

EZBC Risk / Return Rank: 1
EZBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
EZBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
EZBC Omega Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Martin Ratio Rank: 2

GLNK

GLNK Risk / Return Rank: 3
GLNK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
GLNK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
GLNK Omega Ratio Rank: 2
GLNK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
GLNK Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EZBC vs. GLNK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC) and Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF (GLNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EZBC	GLNK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.05	-0.77	-0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.58	-1.38	-0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.83	0.84	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.87	-0.87	0.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.34	-1.03	-0.30

EZBC vs. GLNK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZBC Sharpe Ratio is -1.05, which is lower than the GLNK Sharpe Ratio of -0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZBC and GLNK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EZBC vs. GLNK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZBC drawdown since its inception was -53.35%, smaller than the maximum GLNK drawdown of -96.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZBC and GLNK.

Drawdown Indicators

	EZBC	GLNK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.35%	-96.25%	+42.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.35%	-89.50%	+36.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-96.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.02%	-95.73%	+45.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.28%	-57.20%	+38.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	34.65%	75.11%	-40.46%

Volatility

EZBC vs. GLNK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC) is 9.03%, while Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF (GLNK) has a volatility of 12.97%. This indicates that EZBC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLNK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EZBC	GLNK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.03%	12.97%	-3.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.75%	45.67%	-11.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.37%	100.63%	-56.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.52%	161.98%	-112.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.52%	161.98%	-112.46%

EZBC vs. GLNK - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZBC has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than GLNK's 2.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

EZBC vs. GLNK - Dividend Comparison

Neither EZBC nor GLNK has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EZBC and GLNK in my portfolio?

EZBC and GLNK have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EZBC or GLNK?

GLNK has higher volatility (12.97%) compared to EZBC (9.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZBC dropped -53.35% vs GLNK's -96.25%.

Which ETF is better, EZBC or GLNK?

On 1-year performance, EZBC leads with -44.53% vs -73.63% for GLNK. On fees, EZBC is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, EZBC has been the lower-risk option at 9.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EZBC or GLNK?

Over the 1-year period, EZBC has performed better with a -44.53% return vs -73.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EZBC or GLNK?

EZBC is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for GLNK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EZBC or GLNK?

EZBC and GLNK have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between EZBC and GLNK?

EZBC tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while GLNK tracks Chainlink (LINK). They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZBC and 2.50% for GLNK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLNK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.77 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.