EZBC vs. ETHW

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

EZBC (Franklin Bitcoin ETF) and ETHW (Bitwise Ethereum ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. EZBC is passively managed, while ETHW is actively managed. Over the past year, EZBC returned -35.86% vs -24.72% for ETHW. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EZBC charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ETHW.

Performance

EZBC vs. ETHW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC) and Bitwise Ethereum ETF (ETHW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZBC achieves a -23.26% return, which is significantly higher than ETHW's -35.73% return.

EZBC

• 1D: -5.96%
• 1M: -14.30%
• YTD: -23.26%
• 6M: -26.35%
• 1Y: -35.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ETHW

• 1D: -4.54%
• 1M: -17.20%
• YTD: -35.73%
• 6M: -35.91%
• 1Y: -24.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZBC vs. ETHW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF	-23.26%	-6.56%	42.54%
ETHW Bitwise Ethereum ETF	-35.73%	-11.26%	-3.54%

Correlation

The correlation between EZBC and ETHW is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024	0.82

The correlation between EZBC and ETHW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EZBC vs. ETHW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZBC

EZBC Risk / Return Rank: 2
EZBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Omega Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Martin Ratio Rank: 2

ETHW

ETHW Risk / Return Rank: 6
ETHW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
ETHW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
ETHW Omega Ratio Rank: 7
ETHW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
ETHW Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZBC vs. ETHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC) and Bitwise Ethereum ETF (ETHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EZBC	ETHW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.83	-0.36	-0.46
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.09	-0.11	-0.98
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	0.99	-0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.73	-0.42	-0.31
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.27	-0.69	-0.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EZBC vs. ETHW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZBC Sharpe Ratio is -0.83, which is lower than the ETHW Sharpe Ratio of -0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZBC and ETHW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EZBC	ETHW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.83	-0.36	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	-0.38	+0.71

Drawdowns

EZBC vs. ETHW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZBC drawdown since its inception was -49.37%, smaller than the maximum ETHW drawdown of -64.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZBC and ETHW.

Drawdown Indicators

	EZBC	ETHW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.37%	-64.04%	+14.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-49.37%	-61.69%	+12.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-46.58%	-60.59%	+14.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.96%	-32.59%	+16.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.26%	37.53%	-9.27%

Volatility

EZBC vs. ETHW - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC) and Bitwise Ethereum ETF (ETHW) have volatilities of 9.72% and 9.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EZBC	ETHW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.72%	9.38%	+0.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.80%	46.62%	-11.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.59%	68.11%	-24.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.07%	72.08%	-22.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.07%	72.08%	-22.01%

EZBC vs. ETHW - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZBC has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than ETHW's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EZBC vs. ETHW - Dividend Comparison

Neither EZBC nor ETHW has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EZBC and ETHW in my portfolio?

EZBC and ETHW have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EZBC or ETHW?

EZBC has higher volatility (9.72%) compared to ETHW (9.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZBC dropped -49.37% vs ETHW's -64.04%.

Which ETF is better, EZBC or ETHW?

On 1-year performance, ETHW leads with -24.72% vs -35.86% for EZBC. On fees, EZBC is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ETHW has been the lower-risk option at 9.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EZBC or ETHW?

Over the 1-year period, ETHW has performed better with a -24.72% return vs -35.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EZBC or ETHW?

EZBC is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ETHW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EZBC or ETHW?

EZBC and ETHW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between EZBC and ETHW?

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Bitwise. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZBC and 0.20% for ETHW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ETHW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.36 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.