EZBC vs. CBXO
EZBC (Franklin Bitcoin ETF) and CBXO (Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - EZBC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while CBXO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. EZBC is passively managed, while CBXO is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EZBC charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBXO.
Performance
EZBC vs. CBXO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZBC achieves a -23.26% return, which is significantly lower than CBXO's -3.65% return.
EZBC
- 1D
- -5.96%
- 1M
- -14.30%
- YTD
- -23.26%
- 6M
- -26.35%
- 1Y
- -35.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBXO
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -0.54%
- YTD
- -3.65%
- 6M
- -4.82%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZBC vs. CBXO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF | -23.26% | -28.11% |
CBXO Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | -3.65% | -8.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZBC and CBXO is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | 0.88 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZBC vs. CBXO — Risk / Return Rank
EZBC
CBXO
EZBC vs. CBXO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC) and Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBXO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EZBC | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.09 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.27 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EZBC | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | -2.36 | +2.69 |
Drawdowns
EZBC vs. CBXO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZBC drawdown since its inception was -49.37%, which is greater than CBXO's maximum drawdown of -11.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZBC and CBXO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZBC | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.37% | -11.37% | -38.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.58% | -11.37% | -35.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.96% | -8.44% | -7.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.26% | — | — |
Volatility
EZBC vs. CBXO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZBC | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.72% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.80% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.59% | 7.25% | +36.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.07% | 7.25% | +42.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.07% | 7.25% | +42.82% |
EZBC vs. CBXO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZBC has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than CBXO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
EZBC vs. CBXO - Dividend Comparison
EZBC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBXO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CBXO Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | 0.53% | 0.51% |
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EZBC and CBXO have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EZBC is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EZBC is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CBXO.
CBXO has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.00% for EZBC.
EZBC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBXO is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZBC and 0.69% for CBXO.
Find the right allocation for EZBC and CBXO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer