EYLD vs. INQQ

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

EYLD (Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF) and INQQ (India Internet & Ecommerce ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EYLD is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by Cambria, while INQQ is a India Equities fund tracking the INQQ The India Internet & Ecommerce Index - Benchmark TR Gross. EYLD is actively managed, while INQQ is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EYLD returned 22.23%/yr vs 3.12%/yr for INQQ. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EYLD charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for INQQ.

Performance

EYLD vs. INQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF (EYLD) and India Internet & Ecommerce ETF (INQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EYLD achieves a 21.34% return, which is significantly higher than INQQ's -10.94% return.

EYLD

• 1D: -2.24%
• 1M: -3.31%
• 6M: 16.39%
• YTD: 21.34%
• 1Y: 33.97%
• 3Y*: 22.23%
• 5Y*: 9.97%
• 10Y*: 11.63%

INQQ

• 1D: -0.98%
• 1M: 7.90%
• 6M: -8.61%
• YTD: -10.94%
• 1Y: -18.33%
• 3Y*: 3.12%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EYLD vs. INQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
EYLD Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF	21.34%	29.39%	4.72%	18.77%	-7.10%
INQQ India Internet & Ecommerce ETF	-10.94%	-7.05%	19.12%	31.45%	-34.72%

Correlation

The correlation between EYLD and INQQ is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2022	0.38

EYLD vs. INQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EYLD	INQQ
Financial Services	23.4%	35.3%
Technology	16.2%	11.6%
Industrials	14.8%	-
Energy	7.2%	7.8%
Consumer Cyclical	7.1%	26.9%
Communication Services	4.0%	9.2%
Utilities	4.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	3.2%	2.6%
Healthcare	3.0%	6.7%
Real Estate	2.7%	-
Basic Materials	2.7%	-

Return for Risk

EYLD vs. INQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EYLD

EYLD Risk / Return Rank: 70
EYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
EYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
EYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 67
EYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
EYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 74

INQQ

INQQ Risk / Return Rank: 3
INQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
INQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
INQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2
INQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
INQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EYLD vs. INQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF (EYLD) and India Internet & Ecommerce ETF (INQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EYLD	INQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	-1.03	+2.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.31	-1.44	+3.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	0.84	+0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.24	-0.61	+3.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.78	-1.17	+11.94

EYLD vs. INQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EYLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the INQQ Sharpe Ratio of -1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EYLD and INQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EYLD vs. INQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EYLD drawdown since its inception was -41.82%, roughly equal to the maximum INQQ drawdown of -40.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EYLD and INQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	EYLD	INQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.82%	-40.53%	-1.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.52%	-30.20%	+19.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.89%	-32.45%	+11.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.27%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.12%	-21.63%	+16.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.22%	-17.22%	+7.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.16%	15.71%	-12.55%

Volatility

EYLD vs. INQQ - Volatility Comparison

Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF (EYLD) has a higher volatility of 8.42% compared to India Internet & Ecommerce ETF (INQQ) at 5.31%. This indicates that EYLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EYLD	INQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.42%	5.31%	+3.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.70%	15.23%	+2.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.87%	17.94%	+1.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.54%	19.94%	-1.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.78%	19.94%	+1.84%

EYLD vs. INQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EYLD has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than INQQ's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

EYLD vs. INQQ - Dividend Comparison

EYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, more than INQQ's 2.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
EYLD Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF	5.02%	5.40%	5.16%	5.54%	6.97%	7.27%	3.02%	4.21%	7.87%	2.77%	0.75%
INQQ India Internet & Ecommerce ETF	2.50%	2.23%	1.18%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EYLD and INQQ in my portfolio?

EYLD and INQQ have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EYLD or INQQ?

EYLD has higher volatility (8.42%) compared to INQQ (5.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EYLD dropped -41.82% vs INQQ's -40.53%.

Which ETF is better, EYLD or INQQ?

On 3-year performance, EYLD leads with 22.23% vs 3.12% for INQQ. On fees, EYLD is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, INQQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EYLD or INQQ?

Over the 3-year period, EYLD has performed better with a 22.23% return vs 3.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EYLD or INQQ?

EYLD is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for INQQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EYLD or INQQ?

EYLD has the higher dividend yield at 5.02%, compared with 2.50% for INQQ.

What is the main difference between EYLD and INQQ?

EYLD is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while INQQ is India Equities. They also come from different issuers: Cambria and India. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for EYLD and 0.86% for INQQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.