EYEG vs. VTC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EYEG (AB Corporate Bond ETF) and VTC (Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. EYEG is actively managed, while VTC is passively managed. Over the past year, EYEG returned 5.83% vs 5.99% for VTC. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. EYEG charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VTC.

Performance

EYEG vs. VTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Corporate Bond ETF (EYEG) and Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF (VTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EYEG achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than VTC's 0.60% return.

EYEG

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 0.60%
• YTD: 0.37%
• 6M: 0.15%
• 1Y: 5.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VTC

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 0.63%
• YTD: 0.60%
• 6M: 0.33%
• 1Y: 5.99%
• 3Y*: 5.22%
• 5Y*: 0.51%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EYEG vs. VTC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
EYEG AB Corporate Bond ETF	0.37%	7.42%	3.17%	1.41%
VTC Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF	0.60%	7.58%	2.15%	1.18%

Correlation

The correlation between EYEG and VTC is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2023	0.97

The correlation between EYEG and VTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EYEG vs. VTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EYEG

EYEG Risk / Return Rank: 38
EYEG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
EYEG Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
EYEG Omega Ratio Rank: 35
EYEG Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
EYEG Martin Ratio Rank: 39

VTC

VTC Risk / Return Rank: 39
VTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
VTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
VTC Omega Ratio Rank: 35
VTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
VTC Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EYEG vs. VTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Corporate Bond ETF (EYEG) and Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF (VTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EYEG	VTC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.34	1.38	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	2.02	-0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.24	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.06	2.09	-0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.03	6.63	-0.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EYEG vs. VTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EYEG Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the VTC Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EYEG and VTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EYEG	VTC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.34	1.38	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.07	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.92	0.32	+0.60

Drawdowns

EYEG vs. VTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EYEG drawdown since its inception was -4.66%, smaller than the maximum VTC drawdown of -22.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EYEG and VTC.

Drawdown Indicators

	EYEG	VTC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.66%	-22.05%	+17.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.84%	-2.88%	+0.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-6.46%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.05%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.94%	-0.99%	+0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.25%	-5.84%	+4.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.97%	0.90%	+0.07%

Volatility

EYEG vs. VTC - Volatility Comparison

AB Corporate Bond ETF (EYEG) and Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF (VTC) have volatilities of 1.41% and 1.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EYEG	VTC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.41%	1.43%	-0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.17%	3.22%	-0.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.36%	4.37%	-0.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.47%	7.08%	-1.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.47%	7.68%	-2.21%

EYEG vs. VTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

EYEG has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VTC's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

EYEG vs. VTC - Dividend Comparison

EYEG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.94%, which matches VTC's 4.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EYEG AB Corporate Bond ETF	4.94%	4.94%	6.07%	0.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VTC Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF	4.93%	4.76%	4.50%	3.80%	3.13%	2.36%	2.69%	3.34%	3.53%	0.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EYEG and VTC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, EYEG and VTC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, EYEG or VTC?

VTC has higher volatility (1.43%) compared to EYEG (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EYEG dropped -4.66% vs VTC's -22.05%.

Which ETF is better, EYEG or VTC?

On 1-year performance, VTC leads with 5.99% vs 5.83% for EYEG. On fees, VTC is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EYEG or VTC?

Over the 1-year period, VTC has performed better with a 5.99% return vs 5.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EYEG or VTC?

VTC is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EYEG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EYEG or VTC?

EYEG has the higher dividend yield at 4.94%, compared with 4.93% for VTC.

What is the main difference between EYEG and VTC?

They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EYEG and 0.04% for VTC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.