EYEG vs. VTC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about AB Corporate Bond ETF (EYEG) and Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF (VTC).

EYEG and VTC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EYEG is an actively managed fund by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Dec 12, 2023. VTC is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Corporate Bond Index. It was launched on Nov 7, 2017.

Performance

EYEG vs. VTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Corporate Bond ETF (EYEG) and Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF (VTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EYEG vs. VTC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
EYEG AB Corporate Bond ETF	-0.47%	7.42%	3.17%	1.41%
VTC Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF	-0.26%	7.58%	2.15%	1.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EYEG achieves a -0.47% return, which is significantly lower than VTC's -0.26% return.

EYEG

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: -1.66%
• YTD: -0.47%
• 6M: -0.01%
• 1Y: 4.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VTC

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: -1.83%
• YTD: -0.26%
• 6M: 0.39%
• 1Y: 4.99%
• 3Y*: 4.65%
• 5Y*: 0.63%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EYEG vs. VTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

EYEG has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VTC's 0.04% expense ratio.

EYEG

AB Corporate Bond ETF

VTC

Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF

Return for Risk

EYEG vs. VTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EYEG

EYEG Risk / Return Rank: 44
EYEG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
EYEG Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
EYEG Omega Ratio Rank: 38
EYEG Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
EYEG Martin Ratio Rank: 43

VTC

VTC Risk / Return Rank: 57
VTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
VTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
VTC Omega Ratio Rank: 49
VTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
VTC Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EYEG vs. VTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Corporate Bond ETF (EYEG) and Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF (VTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EYEG	VTC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.84	0.92	-0.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.17	1.28	-0.11
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.18	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.37	1.79	-0.42
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.12	5.39	-1.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EYEG vs. VTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EYEG Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is comparable to the VTC Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EYEG and VTC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EYEG	VTC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84	0.92	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.09	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.91	0.31	+0.60

Correlation

The correlation between EYEG and VTC is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

EYEG vs. VTC - Dividend Comparison

EYEG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, more than VTC's 4.86% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EYEG AB Corporate Bond ETF	5.00%	4.94%	6.07%	0.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VTC Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF	4.86%	4.76%	4.50%	3.80%	3.13%	2.36%	2.69%	3.34%	3.53%	0.55%

Drawdowns

EYEG vs. VTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EYEG drawdown since its inception was -4.66%, smaller than the maximum VTC drawdown of -22.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EYEG and VTC.

Drawdown Indicators

	EYEG	VTC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.66%	-22.05%	+17.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.37%	-2.89%	-0.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.05%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.77%	-1.83%	+0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.26%	-5.94%	+4.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.12%	0.96%	+0.16%

Volatility

EYEG vs. VTC - Volatility Comparison

AB Corporate Bond ETF (EYEG) and Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF (VTC) have volatilities of 2.12% and 2.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EYEG	VTC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.12%	2.19%	-0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.97%	3.02%	-0.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.29%	5.44%	-0.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.54%	7.08%	-1.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.54%	7.74%	-2.20%