PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EYEG vs. QCON
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EYEG vs. QCON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Corporate Bond ETF (EYEG) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


EYEG

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.60%
YTD
0.37%
6M
0.15%
1Y
5.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QCON

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EYEG vs. QCON - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EYEG vs. QCON — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EYEG
EYEG Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
EYEG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EYEG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
EYEG Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
EYEG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
EYEG Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

QCON
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EYEG vs. QCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Corporate Bond ETF (EYEG) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EYEGQCONDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.03

EYEG vs. QCON - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EYEGQCONDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

Drawdowns

EYEG vs. QCON - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EYEG drawdown since its inception was -4.66%, which is greater than QCON's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EYEG and QCON.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EYEGQCONDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.66%

0.00%

-4.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

0.00%

-0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.25%

0.00%

-1.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

Volatility

EYEG vs. QCON - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EYEGQCONDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.36%

0.00%

+4.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.47%

0.00%

+5.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.47%

0.00%

+5.47%

EYEG vs. QCON - Expense Ratio Comparison

EYEG has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than QCON's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

EYEG vs. QCON - Dividend Comparison

EYEG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.94%, while QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
EYEG
AB Corporate Bond ETF
4.94%4.94%6.07%0.25%
QCON
American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, EYEG is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EYEG is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QCON.

EYEG has the higher dividend yield at 4.94%, compared with 0.00% for QCON.

They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EYEG and 0.32% for QCON.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EYEG and QCON

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer