PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EYED.L vs. IWDA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EYED.L vs. IWDA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EYED.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EYED.L is traded in GBP, while IWDA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IWDA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EYED.L achieves a 34.28% return, which is significantly higher than IWDA.L's 10.28% return.


EYED.L

1D
-1.18%
1M
-2.75%
YTD
34.28%
6M
30.34%
1Y
58.34%
3Y*
17.65%
5Y*
10Y*

IWDA.L

1D
0.10%
1M
5.02%
YTD
10.28%
6M
10.21%
1Y
27.20%
3Y*
17.74%
5Y*
13.06%
10Y*
13.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EYED.L vs. IWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
EYED.L
iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
34.28%20.20%-10.02%5.93%5.36%
IWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
10.28%12.41%21.19%18.05%-1.45%

Correlation

The correlation between EYED.L and IWDA.L is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2022

0.17

The correlation between EYED.L and IWDA.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EYED.L vs. IWDA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EYED.L
IWDA.L

Energy

99.2%
3.9%

Communication Services

0.8%
9.3%

Basic Materials

-

2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.8%

Financial Services

-

14.9%

Healthcare

-

8.6%

Industrials

-

9.7%

Real Estate

-

1.2%

Technology

-

32.9%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Energy

EYED.L
99.2%
IWDA.L
3.9%

Communication Services

EYED.L
0.8%
IWDA.L
9.3%

Basic Materials

EYED.L

-

IWDA.L
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

EYED.L

-

IWDA.L
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

EYED.L

-

IWDA.L
4.8%

Financial Services

EYED.L

-

IWDA.L
14.9%

Healthcare

EYED.L

-

IWDA.L
8.6%

Industrials

EYED.L

-

IWDA.L
9.7%

Real Estate

EYED.L

-

IWDA.L
1.2%

Technology

EYED.L

-

IWDA.L
32.9%

Utilities

EYED.L

-

IWDA.L
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EYED.L vs. IWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EYED.L
EYED.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
EYED.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EYED.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
EYED.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
EYED.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
EYED.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

IWDA.L
IWDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
IWDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
IWDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EYED.L vs. IWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EYED.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EYED.LIWDA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.44

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.79

4.25

+0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.52

16.00

-1.49

EYED.L vs. IWDA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EYED.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is comparable to the IWDA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EYED.L and IWDA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EYED.LIWDA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

2.33

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.86

-0.19

Drawdowns

EYED.L vs. IWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EYED.L drawdown since its inception was -25.34%, roughly equal to the maximum IWDA.L drawdown of -26.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EYED.L and IWDA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EYED.LIWDA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.34%

-26.18%

+0.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.12%

-6.37%

-5.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.34%

-18.91%

-6.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.53%

-0.07%

-7.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.26%

-3.39%

-4.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.01%

1.70%

+2.31%

Volatility

EYED.L vs. IWDA.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EYED.L) has a higher volatility of 8.43% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L) at 3.39%. This indicates that EYED.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EYED.LIWDA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.43%

3.39%

+5.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.97%

8.83%

+10.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.35%

11.60%

+10.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.02%

14.49%

+6.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.02%

15.51%

+5.51%

EYED.L vs. IWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EYED.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than IWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EYED.L vs. IWDA.L - Dividend Comparison

EYED.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, while IWDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
EYED.L
iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
3.87%5.09%5.79%5.09%
IWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EYED.L and IWDA.L have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EYED.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EYED.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IWDA.L.

EYED.L is categorized as Energy Equities, while IWDA.L is Global Equities. EYED.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while IWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EYED.L and 0.20% for IWDA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EYED.L and IWDA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer