PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EXXW.DE vs. AMEA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EXXW.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Dow Jones Asia Pacific Select Dividend 50 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXW.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR (AMEA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXXW.DE achieves a 13.56% return, which is significantly lower than AMEA.DE's 31.99% return. Over the past 10 years, EXXW.DE has underperformed AMEA.DE with an annualized return of 7.08%, while AMEA.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 11.07% annualized return.


EXXW.DE

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.30%
YTD
13.56%
6M
14.04%
1Y
36.22%
3Y*
18.59%
5Y*
10.99%
10Y*
7.08%

AMEA.DE

1D
-1.91%
1M
7.99%
YTD
31.99%
6M
34.41%
1Y
55.18%
3Y*
22.86%
5Y*
8.87%
10Y*
11.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXXW.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EXXW.DE
iShares Dow Jones Asia Pacific Select Dividend 50 UCITS ETF (DE)
13.56%15.94%13.25%9.56%4.03%12.54%-18.74%18.28%-10.70%2.63%
AMEA.DE
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR
31.99%18.01%18.95%3.12%-15.34%1.62%15.62%22.11%-12.33%25.47%

Correlation

The correlation between EXXW.DE and AMEA.DE is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2011

0.57

The correlation between EXXW.DE and AMEA.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.61 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EXXW.DE vs. AMEA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXXW.DE
EXXW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
EXXW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXXW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXXW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
EXXW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXXW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

AMEA.DE
AMEA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
AMEA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMEA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMEA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
AMEA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMEA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXXW.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Dow Jones Asia Pacific Select Dividend 50 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXW.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR (AMEA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EXXW.DEAMEA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.50

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.69

4.74

+0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.43

17.16

+3.27

EXXW.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXXW.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.88, which is comparable to the AMEA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXXW.DE and AMEA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EXXW.DEAMEA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.88

2.85

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.48

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.58

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.56

-0.28

Drawdowns

EXXW.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXXW.DE drawdown since its inception was -66.89%, which is greater than AMEA.DE's maximum drawdown of -34.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXXW.DE and AMEA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EXXW.DEAMEA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.89%

-34.43%

-32.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.34%

-11.58%

+5.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.10%

-20.48%

+0.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.10%

-28.78%

+8.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.88%

-33.31%

-8.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.21%

-2.69%

+0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.54%

-11.52%

-0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.77%

3.21%

-1.44%

Volatility

EXXW.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Dow Jones Asia Pacific Select Dividend 50 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXW.DE) is 2.42%, while Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR (AMEA.DE) has a volatility of 8.10%. This indicates that EXXW.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMEA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EXXW.DEAMEA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.42%

8.10%

-5.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.92%

16.15%

-7.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.53%

19.29%

-6.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.38%

18.27%

-4.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.81%

18.97%

-3.16%

EXXW.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EXXW.DE has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than AMEA.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

EXXW.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Dividend Comparison

EXXW.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, while AMEA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMEA.DE
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EXXW.DE
iShares Dow Jones Asia Pacific Select Dividend 50 UCITS ETF (DE)
4.04%4.60%5.32%5.98%7.16%5.56%4.64%5.67%5.04%7.91%4.27%5.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


EXXW.DE and AMEA.DE have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AMEA.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AMEA.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for EXXW.DE.

EXXW.DE tracks Dow Jones Asia/Pacific Select Dividend 50, while AMEA.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for EXXW.DE and 0.20% for AMEA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EXXW.DE and AMEA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer