PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EXXT.DE vs. CG1.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EXXT.DE vs. CG1.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXT.DE) and Amundi ETF DAX UCITS ETF DR (CG1.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EXXT.DE is traded in EUR, while CG1.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CG1.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXXT.DE achieves a 20.57% return, which is significantly higher than CG1.L's 1.40% return. Over the past 10 years, EXXT.DE has outperformed CG1.L with an annualized return of 21.13%, while CG1.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.90% annualized return.


EXXT.DE

1D
-0.82%
1M
9.30%
YTD
20.57%
6M
19.41%
1Y
37.71%
3Y*
24.48%
5Y*
18.61%
10Y*
21.13%

CG1.L

1D
0.46%
1M
2.05%
YTD
1.40%
6M
4.07%
1Y
2.29%
3Y*
15.43%
5Y*
9.13%
10Y*
8.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXXT.DE vs. CG1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EXXT.DE
iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (DE)
20.57%6.87%33.51%51.27%-30.11%39.07%34.53%42.79%2.90%15.46%
CG1.L
Amundi ETF DAX UCITS ETF DR
1.40%21.77%18.63%19.55%-12.37%15.02%3.39%24.19%-18.06%12.01%

Correlation

The correlation between EXXT.DE and CG1.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2011

0.54

The correlation between EXXT.DE and CG1.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EXXT.DE vs. CG1.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXXT.DE
EXXT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
EXXT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXXT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXXT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
EXXT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXXT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

CG1.L
CG1.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
CG1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CG1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
CG1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
CG1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
CG1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXXT.DE vs. CG1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXT.DE) and Amundi ETF DAX UCITS ETF DR (CG1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EXXT.DECG1.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.04

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.73

0.18

+3.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.05

0.58

+10.47

EXXT.DE vs. CG1.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXXT.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is higher than the CG1.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXXT.DE and CG1.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EXXT.DECG1.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

0.15

+2.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.53

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.07

0.48

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.44

+0.35

Drawdowns

EXXT.DE vs. CG1.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXXT.DE drawdown since its inception was -46.75%, which is greater than CG1.L's maximum drawdown of -39.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXXT.DE and CG1.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EXXT.DECG1.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.75%

-39.31%

-7.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.08%

-12.38%

+2.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.62%

-15.67%

-10.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.39%

-26.74%

-4.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.39%

-39.31%

+7.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

-2.33%

+1.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.74%

-7.52%

-0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

3.94%

-0.54%

Volatility

EXXT.DE vs. CG1.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXT.DE) is 4.28%, while Amundi ETF DAX UCITS ETF DR (CG1.L) has a volatility of 4.92%. This indicates that EXXT.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CG1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EXXT.DECG1.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.28%

4.92%

-0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.97%

12.49%

-1.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.78%

15.66%

+0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.90%

17.15%

+2.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.70%

18.45%

+1.25%

EXXT.DE vs. CG1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EXXT.DE has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than CG1.L's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

EXXT.DE vs. CG1.L - Dividend Comparison

EXXT.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, while CG1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CG1.L
Amundi ETF DAX UCITS ETF DR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EXXT.DE
iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (DE)
0.15%0.19%0.26%0.53%0.41%0.15%0.32%0.40%0.28%1.84%0.84%0.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


EXXT.DE and CG1.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CG1.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CG1.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for EXXT.DE.

EXXT.DE is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while CG1.L is Europe Equities. EXXT.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®, while CG1.L tracks FSE DAX TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for EXXT.DE and 0.10% for CG1.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EXXT.DE and CG1.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer