CG1.L vs. IAU
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi ETF DAX UCITS ETF DR (CG1.L) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU).
CG1.L and IAU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CG1.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the FSE DAX TR EUR. It was launched on Sep 16, 2008. IAU is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price. It was launched on Jan 21, 2005. Both CG1.L and IAU are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CG1.L vs. IAU - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CG1.L vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CG1.L Amundi ETF DAX UCITS ETF DR | -5.19% | 28.47% | 13.17% | 17.07% | -7.61% | 7.99% | 9.33% | 16.56% | -16.89% | 16.60% |
IAU iShares Gold Trust | 12.31% | 52.27% | 29.07% | 7.20% | 11.18% | -3.09% | 21.36% | 13.49% | 4.07% | 3.14% |
Different Trading Currencies
CG1.L is traded in GBp, while IAU is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IAU values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CG1.L achieves a -5.19% return, which is significantly lower than IAU's 10.67% return. Over the past 10 years, CG1.L has underperformed IAU with an annualized return of 9.41%, while IAU has yielded a comparatively higher 14.92% annualized return.
CG1.L
- 1D
- 2.66%
- 1M
- -5.96%
- YTD
- -5.19%
- 6M
- -3.41%
- 1Y
- 7.11%
- 3Y*
- 13.28%
- 5Y*
- 9.02%
- 10Y*
- 9.41%
IAU
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -10.96%
- YTD
- 10.67%
- 6M
- 23.31%
- 1Y
- 46.38%
- 3Y*
- 30.07%
- 5Y*
- 22.88%
- 10Y*
- 14.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CG1.L vs. IAU - Expense Ratio Comparison
CG1.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IAU's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
CG1.L vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank
CG1.L
IAU
CG1.L vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF DAX UCITS ETF DR (CG1.L) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CG1.L | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.43 | 1.81 | -1.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.68 | 2.26 | -1.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.35 | -0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.59 | 2.59 | -2.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.20 | 9.86 | -7.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CG1.L | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 | 1.81 | -1.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 1.39 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.92 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.71 | -0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between CG1.L and IAU is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CG1.L vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison
Neither CG1.L nor IAU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CG1.L vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CG1.L drawdown since its inception was -34.44%, smaller than the maximum IAU drawdown of -41.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CG1.L and IAU.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CG1.L | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.44% | -45.14% | +10.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.92% | -19.18% | +6.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.46% | -20.93% | -2.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.44% | -21.82% | -12.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.76% | -11.71% | +2.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.11% | -15.98% | +8.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.50% | 5.23% | -1.73% |
Volatility
CG1.L vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi ETF DAX UCITS ETF DR (CG1.L) is 6.91%, while iShares Gold Trust (IAU) has a volatility of 10.61%. This indicates that CG1.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CG1.L | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.91% | 10.61% | -3.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.44% | 23.05% | -11.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.64% | 25.73% | -9.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.90% | 16.48% | +0.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.95% | 16.18% | +1.77% |