PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EXV8.DE vs. 2B7C.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EXV8.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares STOXX Europe 600 Construction & Materials UCITS ETF (DE) (EXV8.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7C.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXV8.DE achieves a 1.00% return, which is significantly lower than 2B7C.DE's 13.30% return.


EXV8.DE

1D
0.17%
1M
-1.18%
YTD
1.00%
6M
3.34%
1Y
7.54%
3Y*
15.58%
5Y*
9.70%
10Y*
10.37%

2B7C.DE

1D
-0.23%
1M
2.46%
YTD
13.30%
6M
14.07%
1Y
20.91%
3Y*
18.60%
5Y*
13.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXV8.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EXV8.DE
iShares STOXX Europe 600 Construction & Materials UCITS ETF (DE)
1.00%25.00%6.42%33.57%-18.92%32.25%-2.02%42.92%-17.87%2.82%
2B7C.DE
iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF
13.30%6.91%23.72%13.89%-0.20%32.19%-0.63%32.20%-10.13%4.44%

Correlation

The correlation between EXV8.DE and 2B7C.DE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2017

0.62

The correlation between EXV8.DE and 2B7C.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EXV8.DE vs. 2B7C.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXV8.DE
EXV8.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
EXV8.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXV8.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXV8.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
EXV8.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXV8.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

2B7C.DE
2B7C.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
2B7C.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2B7C.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
2B7C.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
2B7C.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
2B7C.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXV8.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares STOXX Europe 600 Construction & Materials UCITS ETF (DE) (EXV8.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7C.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EXV8.DE2B7C.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.26

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.49

2.34

-1.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.50

7.59

-6.09

EXV8.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXV8.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the 2B7C.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXV8.DE and 2B7C.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EXV8.DE2B7C.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

1.44

-1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.78

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.60

-0.16

Drawdowns

EXV8.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXV8.DE drawdown since its inception was -66.09%, which is greater than 2B7C.DE's maximum drawdown of -41.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXV8.DE and 2B7C.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EXV8.DE2B7C.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.09%

-41.33%

-24.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.30%

-8.89%

-6.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.83%

-22.66%

+5.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.23%

-22.66%

-6.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.66%

-0.47%

-6.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.00%

-5.04%

-9.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.00%

2.75%

+2.25%

Volatility

EXV8.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares STOXX Europe 600 Construction & Materials UCITS ETF (DE) (EXV8.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.24% compared to iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7C.DE) at 3.74%. This indicates that EXV8.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 2B7C.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EXV8.DE2B7C.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.24%

3.74%

+2.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.12%

10.98%

+5.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.72%

14.45%

+5.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.47%

16.73%

+2.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.26%

19.35%

+0.91%

EXV8.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EXV8.DE has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than 2B7C.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

EXV8.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Dividend Comparison

EXV8.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, while 2B7C.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
2B7C.DE
iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EXV8.DE
iShares STOXX Europe 600 Construction & Materials UCITS ETF (DE)
1.39%1.39%1.69%1.59%1.78%1.34%0.53%1.55%1.66%2.87%2.80%2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


EXV8.DE and 2B7C.DE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 2B7C.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

2B7C.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for EXV8.DE.

EXV8.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Construction & Materials, while 2B7C.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for EXV8.DE and 0.15% for 2B7C.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EXV8.DE and 2B7C.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer