PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EXV6.DE vs. AMEM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EXV6.DE vs. AMEM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares STOXX Europe 600 Basic Resources UCITS ETF (DE) (EXV6.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR (AMEM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXV6.DE achieves a 13.67% return, which is significantly lower than AMEM.DE's 20.68% return. Over the past 10 years, EXV6.DE has outperformed AMEM.DE with an annualized return of 13.41%, while AMEM.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 8.29% annualized return.


EXV6.DE

1D
-0.90%
1M
-7.75%
6M
4.86%
YTD
13.67%
1Y
55.84%
3Y*
14.31%
5Y*
9.15%
10Y*
13.41%
ALL TIME*
4.47%

AMEM.DE

1D
1.23%
1M
-8.29%
6M
12.96%
YTD
20.68%
1Y
35.22%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
7.63%
10Y*
8.29%
ALL TIME*
6.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXV6.DE vs. AMEM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EXV6.DE
iShares STOXX Europe 600 Basic Resources UCITS ETF (DE)
13.67%33.18%-8.72%-2.31%9.36%26.74%12.82%22.32%-13.59%22.50%
AMEM.DE
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR
20.68%19.22%13.69%5.35%-13.83%3.96%6.43%21.24%-11.00%20.46%

Correlation

The correlation between EXV6.DE and AMEM.DE is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2011

0.63

The correlation between EXV6.DE and AMEM.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EXV6.DE vs. AMEM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXV6.DE
EXV6.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
EXV6.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXV6.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXV6.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
EXV6.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXV6.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

AMEM.DE
AMEM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
AMEM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMEM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMEM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
AMEM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMEM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXV6.DE vs. AMEM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares STOXX Europe 600 Basic Resources UCITS ETF (DE) (EXV6.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR (AMEM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EXV6.DEAMEM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.32

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

3.17

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.30

9.65

-0.35

EXV6.DE vs. AMEM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXV6.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the AMEM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXV6.DE and AMEM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EXV6.DE vs. AMEM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXV6.DE drawdown since its inception was -73.84%, which is greater than AMEM.DE's maximum drawdown of -35.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXV6.DE and AMEM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EXV6.DEAMEM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.84%

-35.91%

-37.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.40%

-11.06%

-7.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.37%

-19.20%

-14.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.26%

-22.67%

-14.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.38%

-31.83%

-13.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.27%

-9.96%

-6.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.23%

-10.19%

-21.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.98%

3.64%

+2.34%

Volatility

EXV6.DE vs. AMEM.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares STOXX Europe 600 Basic Resources UCITS ETF (DE) (EXV6.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR (AMEM.DE) have volatilities of 8.93% and 8.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EXV6.DEAMEM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.93%

8.54%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.93%

17.72%

+6.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.31%

20.15%

+7.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.44%

17.27%

+9.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.22%

18.48%

+8.74%

EXV6.DE vs. AMEM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EXV6.DE has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than AMEM.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

EXV6.DE vs. AMEM.DE - Dividend Comparison

EXV6.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, while AMEM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMEM.DE
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EXV6.DE
iShares STOXX Europe 600 Basic Resources UCITS ETF (DE)
1.81%1.95%3.23%3.57%6.02%5.15%2.86%5.56%2.93%2.14%1.80%5.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


EXV6.DE and AMEM.DE have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AMEM.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AMEM.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for EXV6.DE.

EXV6.DE is categorized as Industrials Equities, while AMEM.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. EXV6.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Basic Resources, while AMEM.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for EXV6.DE and 0.20% for AMEM.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EXV6.DE and AMEM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer