PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EXUS.L vs. XSTC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EXUS.L vs. XSTC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD (EXUS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EXUS.L is traded in USD, while XSTC.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XSTC.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXUS.L achieves a 8.61% return, which is significantly lower than XSTC.L's 25.71% return.


EXUS.L

1D
-0.53%
1M
3.48%
YTD
8.61%
6M
11.84%
1Y
22.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XSTC.L

1D
-0.85%
1M
17.80%
YTD
25.71%
6M
25.74%
1Y
56.15%
3Y*
35.24%
5Y*
23.44%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXUS.L vs. XSTC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EXUS.L and XSTC.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024

0.49

EXUS.L vs. XSTC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EXUS.L
XSTC.L

Financial Services

26.2%
0.1%

Industrials

18.6%
0.2%

Technology

10.1%
99.6%

Healthcare

9.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%

-

Basic Materials

7.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.4%

-

Energy

5.9%
0.1%

Communication Services

4.0%
0.1%

Utilities

3.7%

-

Real Estate

1.7%

-

Financial Services

EXUS.L
26.2%
XSTC.L
0.1%

Industrials

EXUS.L
18.6%
XSTC.L
0.2%

Technology

EXUS.L
10.1%
XSTC.L
99.6%

Healthcare

EXUS.L
9.2%
XSTC.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

EXUS.L
7.1%
XSTC.L

-

Basic Materials

EXUS.L
7.0%
XSTC.L

-

Consumer Defensive

EXUS.L
6.4%
XSTC.L

-

Energy

EXUS.L
5.9%
XSTC.L
0.1%

Communication Services

EXUS.L
4.0%
XSTC.L
0.1%

Utilities

EXUS.L
3.7%
XSTC.L

-

Real Estate

EXUS.L
1.7%
XSTC.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EXUS.L vs. XSTC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXUS.L
EXUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
EXUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
EXUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

XSTC.L
XSTC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
XSTC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXUS.L vs. XSTC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD (EXUS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EXUS.LXSTC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.46

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

3.19

-1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.76

9.53

-1.77

EXUS.L vs. XSTC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is lower than the XSTC.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXUS.L and XSTC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EXUS.LXSTC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

2.80

-1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.18

1.08

+0.10

Drawdowns

EXUS.L vs. XSTC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXUS.L drawdown since its inception was -12.85%, smaller than the maximum XSTC.L drawdown of -35.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXUS.L and XSTC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EXUS.LXSTC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.85%

-35.20%

+22.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.74%

-17.54%

+6.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.92%

-0.85%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.36%

-7.34%

+4.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

5.88%

-2.95%

Volatility

EXUS.L vs. XSTC.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD (EXUS.L) is 4.34%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) has a volatility of 6.37%. This indicates that EXUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSTC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EXUS.LXSTC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

6.37%

-2.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.23%

14.94%

-2.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.64%

20.00%

-5.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.30%

23.48%

-8.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.30%

23.42%

-8.12%

EXUS.L vs. XSTC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EXUS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XSTC.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EXUS.L vs. XSTC.L - Dividend Comparison

EXUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XSTC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
EXUS.L
Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSTC.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D
0.25%0.33%0.37%0.53%1.08%0.53%0.63%0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


EXUS.L and XSTC.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSTC.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSTC.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for EXUS.L.

EXUS.L is categorized as Global Equities, while XSTC.L is Technology Equities. EXUS.L tracks MSCI World ex USA index, while XSTC.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EXUS.L and 0.12% for XSTC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EXUS.L and XSTC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer