EXUS.L vs. XMUS.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EXUS.L (Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD) and XMUS.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Swap UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - EXUS.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA index, while XMUS.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EXUS.L returned 22.79% vs 27.55% for XMUS.L. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.

Performance

EXUS.L vs. XMUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD (EXUS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

EXUS.L is traded in USD, while XMUS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XMUS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXUS.L achieves a 8.61% return, which is significantly lower than XMUS.L's 10.17% return.

EXUS.L

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 3.48%
• YTD: 8.61%
• 6M: 11.84%
• 1Y: 22.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XMUS.L

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: 4.71%
• YTD: 10.17%
• 6M: 11.08%
• 1Y: 27.55%
• 3Y*: 22.56%
• 5Y*: 13.44%
• 10Y*: 15.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXUS.L vs. XMUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EXUS.L Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD	8.61%	31.98%	1.23%
XMUS.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Swap UCITS ETF 1C	10.17%	17.60%	17.03%

Correlation

The correlation between EXUS.L and XMUS.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024	0.64

The correlation between EXUS.L and XMUS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

EXUS.L vs. XMUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EXUS.L	XMUS.L
Financial Services	26.2%	11.6%
Industrials	18.6%	8.6%
Technology	10.1%	35.4%
Healthcare	9.2%	8.6%
Consumer Cyclical	7.1%	10.1%
Basic Materials	7.0%	1.8%
Consumer Defensive	6.4%	4.8%
Energy	5.9%	3.6%
Communication Services	4.0%	11.3%
Utilities	3.7%	2.3%
Real Estate	1.7%	1.9%

Return for Risk

EXUS.L vs. XMUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXUS.L

EXUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 44
EXUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
EXUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
EXUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
EXUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
EXUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 46

XMUS.L

XMUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 78
XMUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
XMUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
XMUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 83
XMUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
XMUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXUS.L vs. XMUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD (EXUS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EXUS.L	XMUS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	2.48	-0.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.30	3.58	-1.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.44	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.10	3.07	-0.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.76	13.11	-5.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EXUS.L vs. XMUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is lower than the XMUS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXUS.L and XMUS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EXUS.L	XMUS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.54	2.48	-0.94
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.85	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.95	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.18	0.59	+0.59

Drawdowns

EXUS.L vs. XMUS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXUS.L drawdown since its inception was -12.85%, smaller than the maximum XMUS.L drawdown of -54.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXUS.L and XMUS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	EXUS.L	XMUS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.85%	-54.81%	+41.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.74%	-9.07%	-1.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.54%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.17%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.83%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.92%	-0.47%	-0.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.36%	-7.98%	+5.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.93%	2.13%	+0.80%

Volatility

EXUS.L vs. XMUS.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD (EXUS.L) has a higher volatility of 4.34% compared to Xtrackers MSCI USA Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMUS.L) at 2.48%. This indicates that EXUS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EXUS.L	XMUS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.34%	2.48%	+1.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.23%	8.07%	+4.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.64%	11.28%	+3.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.30%	15.91%	-0.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.30%	16.31%	-1.01%

EXUS.L vs. XMUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EXUS.L and XMUS.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EXUS.L vs. XMUS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither EXUS.L nor XMUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EXUS.L and XMUS.L in my portfolio?

EXUS.L and XMUS.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EXUS.L or XMUS.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EXUS.L or XMUS.L?

EXUS.L and XMUS.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

What is the main difference between EXUS.L and XMUS.L?

EXUS.L is categorized as Global Equities, while XMUS.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. EXUS.L tracks MSCI World ex USA index, while XMUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD.