PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EXUS.L vs. IWVG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EXUS.L vs. IWVG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD (EXUS.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EXUS.L is traded in USD, while IWVG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IWVG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXUS.L achieves a 8.61% return, which is significantly lower than IWVG.L's 34.86% return.


EXUS.L

1D
-0.53%
1M
3.48%
YTD
8.61%
6M
11.84%
1Y
22.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IWVG.L

1D
-0.16%
1M
15.32%
YTD
34.86%
6M
38.07%
1Y
62.99%
3Y*
28.81%
5Y*
15.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXUS.L vs. IWVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EXUS.L and IWVG.L is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024

0.82

The correlation between EXUS.L and IWVG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

EXUS.L vs. IWVG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EXUS.L
IWVG.L

Financial Services

26.2%
14.8%

Industrials

18.6%
11.3%

Technology

10.1%
33.9%

Healthcare

9.2%
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
7.9%

Basic Materials

7.0%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
4.5%

Energy

5.9%
3.8%

Communication Services

4.0%
7.6%

Utilities

3.7%
2.5%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.8%

Financial Services

EXUS.L
26.2%
IWVG.L
14.8%

Industrials

EXUS.L
18.6%
IWVG.L
11.3%

Technology

EXUS.L
10.1%
IWVG.L
33.9%

Healthcare

EXUS.L
9.2%
IWVG.L
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

EXUS.L
7.1%
IWVG.L
7.9%

Basic Materials

EXUS.L
7.0%
IWVG.L
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

EXUS.L
6.4%
IWVG.L
4.5%

Energy

EXUS.L
5.9%
IWVG.L
3.8%

Communication Services

EXUS.L
4.0%
IWVG.L
7.6%

Utilities

EXUS.L
3.7%
IWVG.L
2.5%

Real Estate

EXUS.L
1.7%
IWVG.L
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EXUS.L vs. IWVG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXUS.L
EXUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
EXUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
EXUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

IWVG.L
IWVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
IWVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXUS.L vs. IWVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD (EXUS.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EXUS.LIWVG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.75

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

7.25

-5.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.76

27.57

-19.81

EXUS.L vs. IWVG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is lower than the IWVG.L Sharpe Ratio of 4.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXUS.L and IWVG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EXUS.LIWVG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

4.24

-2.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.18

0.63

+0.55

Drawdowns

EXUS.L vs. IWVG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXUS.L drawdown since its inception was -12.85%, smaller than the maximum IWVG.L drawdown of -35.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXUS.L and IWVG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EXUS.LIWVG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.85%

-35.72%

+22.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.74%

-8.65%

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.92%

-0.16%

-0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.36%

-6.70%

+4.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

2.28%

+0.65%

Volatility

EXUS.L vs. IWVG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD (EXUS.L) is 4.34%, while iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L) has a volatility of 6.12%. This indicates that EXUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EXUS.LIWVG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

6.12%

-1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.23%

11.90%

+0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.64%

14.80%

-0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.30%

15.70%

-0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.30%

17.58%

-2.28%

EXUS.L vs. IWVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EXUS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IWVG.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

EXUS.L vs. IWVG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither EXUS.L nor IWVG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
EXUS.L
Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IWVG.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.00%0.00%1.82%3.23%3.12%2.61%2.37%2.90%2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


EXUS.L and IWVG.L have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EXUS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EXUS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IWVG.L.

EXUS.L tracks MSCI World ex USA index, while IWVG.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EXUS.L and 0.30% for IWVG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EXUS.L and IWVG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer