PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EXIE.DE vs. CEMT.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EXIE.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (DE) EUR Acc (EXIE.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF (CEMT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


EXIE.DE

1D
0.59%
1M
0.81%
YTD
7.44%
6M
9.96%
1Y
16.03%
3Y*
13.87%
5Y*
10Y*

CEMT.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
3.97%
3Y*
9.41%
5Y*
4.08%
10Y*
6.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXIE.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
EXIE.DE
iShares STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (DE) EUR Acc
7.44%20.59%8.32%6.62%
CEMT.DE
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF
0.00%17.53%5.08%3.89%

Correlation

The correlation between EXIE.DE and CEMT.DE is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2023

0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between EXIE.DE and CEMT.DE has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EXIE.DE vs. CEMT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXIE.DE
EXIE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
EXIE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXIE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXIE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
EXIE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXIE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

CEMT.DE
CEMT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
CEMT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEMT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEMT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
CEMT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEMT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXIE.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (DE) EUR Acc (EXIE.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF (CEMT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EXIE.DECEMT.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.21

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

1.10

+0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.42

4.03

+2.38

EXIE.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXIE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the CEMT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXIE.DE and CEMT.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EXIE.DECEMT.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

0.77

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

0.37

+0.63

Drawdowns

EXIE.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXIE.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.04%, smaller than the maximum CEMT.DE drawdown of -37.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXIE.DE and CEMT.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EXIE.DECEMT.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.04%

-37.66%

+21.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.58%

-4.26%

-5.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.04%

-14.36%

-1.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.65%

-0.39%

-1.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.03%

-7.08%

+5.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

1.16%

+1.38%

Volatility

EXIE.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (DE) EUR Acc (EXIE.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.35% compared to iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF (CEMT.DE) at 0.00%. This indicates that EXIE.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEMT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EXIE.DECEMT.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.35%

0.00%

+4.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.75%

0.00%

+10.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.00%

6.11%

+6.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.99%

14.61%

-1.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.99%

16.11%

-3.12%

EXIE.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EXIE.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CEMT.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EXIE.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EXIE.DE nor CEMT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


EXIE.DE and CEMT.DE have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EXIE.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EXIE.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CEMT.DE.

EXIE.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600, while CEMT.DE tracks MSCI Europe Mid Cap Equal Weighted. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EXIE.DE and 0.25% for CEMT.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EXIE.DE and CEMT.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer