PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EXI3.DE vs. LCUS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EXI3.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Dow Jones Industrial Average UCITS ETF (DE) (EXI3.DE) and Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


EXI3.DE

1D
1.20%
1M
4.70%
YTD
7.97%
6M
8.07%
1Y
20.04%
3Y*
13.03%
5Y*
10.15%
10Y*
11.97%

LCUS.DE

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXI3.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EXI3.DE
iShares Dow Jones Industrial Average UCITS ETF (DE)
7.97%1.60%20.65%11.22%-3.15%31.43%-2.14%27.50%1.03%
LCUS.DE
Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
0.00%3.40%32.87%22.96%-15.87%37.82%9.09%34.14%-0.91%

Correlation

The correlation between EXI3.DE and LCUS.DE is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2018

0.79

The correlation between EXI3.DE and LCUS.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (3 years) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EXI3.DE vs. LCUS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXI3.DE
EXI3.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
EXI3.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXI3.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXI3.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
EXI3.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXI3.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

LCUS.DE
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXI3.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Dow Jones Industrial Average UCITS ETF (DE) (EXI3.DE) and Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EXI3.DELCUS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.77

EXI3.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EXI3.DELCUS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

Drawdowns

EXI3.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EXI3.DELCUS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

Volatility

EXI3.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EXI3.DELCUS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.06%

EXI3.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EXI3.DE has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than LCUS.DE's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

EXI3.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Dividend Comparison

EXI3.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, while LCUS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EXI3.DE
iShares Dow Jones Industrial Average UCITS ETF (DE)
0.59%0.63%0.75%0.91%0.93%0.67%1.08%1.06%0.73%1.23%1.43%1.95%
LCUS.DE
Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
0.00%0.00%0.84%0.78%2.27%1.12%1.52%1.10%1.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EXI3.DE and LCUS.DE have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LCUS.DE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LCUS.DE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for EXI3.DE.

EXI3.DE tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average, while LCUS.DE tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for EXI3.DE and 0.04% for LCUS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EXI3.DE and LCUS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer